Re: changes to ps -d?
- Reply: Piotr P. Stefaniak: "Re: changes to ps -d?"
- Reply: Jamie Landeg-Jones : "Re: changes to ps -d?"
- In reply to: Michael Gmelin : "Re: changes to ps -d?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:22:49 UTC
Van: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Datum: dinsdag, 19 september 2023 13:01 Aan: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> CC: pstef@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: changes to ps -d? > > > > > >> On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1]. >> I could use "ps axd -p <pid>" to see the process tree of some ongoing task. >> In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p <pid> -D down". Can this become the default again? At least when -d is used. >> > > > There was a discussion on the FreeBSD-current mailing list that lead to the decision to make this change: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-July/004071.html > > Best > Thanks, I missed that conversation. Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was" in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html. Currently in "ps -d -p <pid>" -d is not back at what it was. Regards, Ronald.