Re: RFC: NFS over TLS stats
- Reply: Rick Macklem : "Re: RFC: NFS over TLS stats"
- In reply to: Simon J. Gerraty: "Re: RFC: NFS over TLS stats"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:28:57 UTC
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:10 PM Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote: > > Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgbytes: 20828 > > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgcnt: 57 > > > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_tmsgbytes: 12336 > > > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_msgcnt: 57 > > > > > > which allows for sysctl kern.rpctls.tls > > Not sure what you mean? > > If for some reason I only care about tls I can do > > sysctl kern.rpctls.tls > > and get > > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgbytes: 20828 > kern.rpctls.tls.snd_msgcnt: 57 > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_tmsgbytes: 12336 > kern.rpctls.tls.rcv_msgcnt: 57 > > otherwise I'd have to do > > sysctl kern.rpctls | grep tls > > > I am listing counts for TLS and non-TLS so they can > > be compared. As such, a "tls" in the last component of > > the name is needed, unless I list the non-TLS ones > > Ok > > > under something else like: > > kern.rpc.snd_msgbytes > > > > I currently actually have them all as: > > kern.rpc.tls.XXX instead of kern.rpctls.XXX, > > Haha I didn't notice the tls in rpctls ;-) > > > since there was already kern.rpc.gss.XXX. > > kern.rpc.tls.XXX sounds fine Ok, how does this look? kern.rpc.nontls.tx_msgcnt: 58 kern.rpc.nontls.tx_msgbytes: 20828 kern.rpc.nontls.rx_msgcnt: 58 kern.rpc.nontls.rx_msgbytes: 12072 kern.rpc.tls.tx_msgcnt: 62639 kern.rpc.tls.tx_msgbytes: 30800352 kern.rpc.tls.rx_msgcnt: 62639 kern.rpc.tls.rx_msgbytes: 13473756 kern.rpc.tls.handshake_success: 1 kern.rpc.tls.handshake_failed: 0 kern.rpc.tls.alerts: 1 It doesn't put the nonTLS and TLS lines for a given stat next to each other, but does allow either the nonTLS or TLS stats to be displayed easily and keeps the two sets adjacent, so they can be compared easily. rick > > > > > rick