Re: uname -KU 1500001 1500000

Graham Perrin <grahamperrin_at_gmail.com> wrote on
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 03:57:59 UTC :

> On 01/10/2023 23:41, Mark Millard wrote:
> > That indicates that __FreeBSD_version was 1500000 when the uname that 
> > was run was built but the running kernel was built when 
> > __FreeBSD_version was 1500001 . (Presumes a lack of use of OSVERSION 
> > to override the getosreldate result for the kernel case.)
> >
> > What does "file /usr/bin/uname" report? Which does it list for:
> >
> > FreeBSD 15.0 (1500000)
> > vs.
> > FreeBSD 15.0 (1500001)
> >
> > ?
> 
> 
> % file /usr/bin/uname
> /usr/bin/uname: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 
> (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1, for 
> FreeBSD 15.0 (1500001), FreeBSD-style, stripped
> %


Interesting: /usr/bin/uname with "FreeBSD 15.0 (1500001)" produces
1500000 for "uname -U" ? Does seem odd. May be I should also have
asked for the (modification?) time via an appropriate ls command?
Or file and ls results for the amd64.amd64/usr.bin/uname/uname.o ?
(Just checking for if there are surprises.)

At the moment I do not have a good idea for the "FreeBSD 15.0
(1500001)" context giving "uname -U" 1500000 result combination.

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com