Re: "options MAXMEMDOM=2" vs. amd64 DBG kernel booting: 3000+ "kernel: Process (pid 1) got signal 5" notices during booting
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: "options MAXMEMDOM=2" vs. amd64 DBG kernel booting: 3000+ "kernel: Process (pid 1) got signal 5" notices during booting"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : ""options MAXMEMDOM=2" vs. amd64 DBG kernel booting: 3000+ "kernel: Process (pid 1) got signal 5" notices during booting"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:28:26 UTC
On Nov 21, 2023, at 21:43, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > While my kernel/world build procedures build both DBG and NODBG > kernels and worlds, I normally run the NODBG kernel and world, > using DBG only when I need to for problem investigation. > > I recently had reason to use the DBG kernel and found it got the > oddity of 3000+ instances of "kernel: Process (pid 1) got signal 5" > during booting, as reported in /var/log/messages . An example is: > > . . . > Nov 20 23:13:09 7950X3D-UFS shutdown[20174]: reboot by root: > Nov 20 23:13:09 7950X3D-UFS syslogd: exiting on signal 15 > Nov 20 23:14:21 7950X3D-UFS syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > Nov 20 23:14:21 7950X3D-UFS kernel: got signal 5 > Nov 20 23:14:21 7950X3D-UFS kernel: Process (pid 1) got signal 5 > Nov 20 23:14:21 7950X3D-UFS syslogd: last message repeated 3133 times > Nov 20 23:14:21 7950X3D-UFS kernel: intsmb0: <AMD FCH SMBus Controller> at device 20.0 on pci0 > . . . > > This stopped when I commented out the: > > options MAXMEMDOM=2 > > that I've had historically and built, installed, and booted > the resulting DBG kernel. > > I'll note that I never had the messages for the NODDBG kernel, > despite it also having that line. > > > For reference: > > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD 7950X3D-UFS 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #2 main-n266130-d521abdff236-dirty: Tue Nov 21 21:03:11 PST 2023 root@7950X3D-UFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-amd64-dbg-clang/usr/main-src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-DBG amd64 amd64 1500002 1500002 > > # ~/fbsd-based-on-what-commit.sh -C /usr/main-src/ > d521abdff236 (HEAD -> main, freebsd/main, freebsd/HEAD) Update ASLR stack sysctl description in security.7 and mitigations.7 > Author: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> > Commit: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2023-10-24 22:29:25 +0000 > branch: main > merge-base: d521abdff2367a5c72a773a815fc3d99403274f5 > merge-base: CommitDate: 2023-10-24 22:29:25 +0000 > n266130 (--first-parent --count for merge-base) > A few more related notes follow. First off, while I've historically built with NUMA support present in the kernel, I'd only ever configured a UEFI/system to indicate NUMA back in some experiments in my early days of ThreadRipper 1950X use (years ago now). The "options MAXMEMDOM=2" had been in place since back then, with no known contributions to any problems. (Until recently the 1950X was the only amd64 context. Now there is also a Ryzen 9 7950X3D.) Recently, I've been testing a potential patch to UFS associated with changing from: #define UFS_LINK_MAX 32767 to, say, #define UFS_LINK_MAX 65530 I had discovered that "bulk -a" was broken on amd64 for UFS, and was so via hitting UFS_LINK_MAX for how the associated directories trees are currently structured. I'm not the author of the UFS patch. The "options MAXMEMDOM=2" vs. not status changed the behavior of my UFS "bulk -a" runs, not just the messages reporting: "kernel: Process (pid 1) got signal 5". With MAXMEMDOM=2 I was getting occasional random port build failures with the non-debug kernel for a UFS context. (The original discovery was in a non-debug kernel/world context.) I'd not gotten to 2 hr into a "bulk -a" without getting such a random port build failure. By contrast, my normal non-debug kernel ZFS context did not get such random port build errors during "bulk -a". (I've done multiple from-scratch "bulk -a" builds from the same, non-updated /usr/ports tree [same by content].) Without MAXMEMDOM=2 I am not getting the random port build failures in any context that I've tried. So far as I can tell, this "Without MAXMEMDOM=2" type of context is simply working correctly. A from-scratch "bulk -a" worked for a non-debug kernel used with UFS, no evidence of any problems, the port build failures being ones that happen in other contexts as well. For reference: [main-amd64-bulk_a-default] [2023-11-21_22h14m34s] [committing:] Queued: 34683 Built: 33843 Failed: 163 Skipped: 357 Ignored: 320 Fetched: 0 Tobuild: 0 Time: 33:17:31 [33:17:32] Logs: /usr/local/poudriere/data/logs/bulk/main-amd64-bulk_a-default/2023-11-21_22h14m34s === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com