Re: MOTD is not created correctly (since 2022/02/18)
- In reply to: Garance A Drosehn : "Re: MOTD is not created correctly (since 2022/02/18)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 22:32:45 UTC
Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Not that it helps you much, but I did notice it and have an alternate > version of rc.d/motd on my own systems. I had no particular attachment > to the earlier format, so my motd starts out by printing the two lines > of: > ``` > -KU 1302505 1302505 -b 18fa15f83c483db67b818e3a48bbb312908754b1 > FreeBSD 13.2-STABLE (Garance-13x) #0 -- Fri May 5 17:53:55 EDT 2023 I too was actually not all that fussed with the old style, but the multiple spaces in the output bugged me, so I was going to change it back, when I stumbled on the issue. I actually have closer to yours in my ssh-banner: ****************** <catflap.dyslexicfish.net> ****************** FreeBSD/amd64 13.2-STABLE - Build 1302505 (May 13, 2023) 23:25 BST up 1 01:30 0.16, 0.18, 0.16 -- SOD OFF IF YOU AREN'T AUTHORISED **************************************************************** > But I thought that committing that would trigger a bikeshed debate, so I > also have an option to produce the output we previously had. And given > that no one seemed to be complaining about the "full uname" version, I > figured I had an option for that too. And then I thought all these > options > were overkill and would trigger and even longer debate, so I never > brought > the ideas forward. :) :-) Oh yeah, definitely! It would be worse than the fractional seconds in sleep(1) debate! Cheers, for the response, Jamie