From nobody Mon May 22 15:03:37 2023 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QQ11L1vl2z4BYsZ for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 15:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QQ11L1N3gz3Kd4; Mon, 22 May 2023 15:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1684767830; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tudMQfzVBY+xOtU4l45z181Wv2Tfnm67WR7zXR4ZsL0=; b=mcohT3wOpx3EuptOPclXnCeSF4+d0bx03XVSYD0cREm0pnjRISYebsJxeetAm1qSwERt15 XStXi02SCQDhy824WjAh/fqzu6KbBli47gBmysvOfisepGlx0PMTnc1L9aKbtQZAIXwmcn M4yF/uyesVNC5qCLT1OUZjTajzIUvV2BQRSAqgkrJlLrFaZlhwqxHNtRJYAFN5PYz2QTy4 NmL5UWdSC5a7kzMsDf1eBVbrBK7NQ7Gc+DXWTBPn3OjfT5KRtBqSqOX11k6iyyM8mD3H6w c+3nz8K3OY/XV2VggXWRet1+7rOrBmxbs+93PAYcnO8jjpQ7rh6D8irT99oMCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1684767830; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tudMQfzVBY+xOtU4l45z181Wv2Tfnm67WR7zXR4ZsL0=; b=cQMq2ctGJ6us8nlsL2aw8Wyw7eaWDR2reGxhhP2SgxWoxvOw05QG9+/cEtyGxLTJD3eb0B FQsj8oIgk/yvCMBkDBI0YCERWjJmfXwNKFpcrHwyeczy2EjO+suoyazM+aharFqY5I5+Pd qQr7ywGDVb245oQBOFNAVXlTRQ33knh01F57TYmNUO1BWd+45mR5hHJycJJhyqTV8/7QtX IVoGn/nFlLuXQT0TGXZtZMPfpA1lJFvfIhSpcsDpdIxnvi54sqqi9k09GZi5oTcaBseF48 x/DZLply/RaJKHwrYwfYB+lW6UtyViAIcqT2VEG042Q0JrpnF+eTIYblpxtzHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1684767830; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kMSbzdonDKAwtrKyB4TQQViXzLT216foOkzPui9OjJJXEAh6NY/uYK8XI0xh+n53v/JKBE kYMf4aWxrcBFlG9wnvX1t6Paw13SZymr1bljTB0mSfBqDj5Bde15o4+JT+HagIkXyIlSkh fF3FvRcQ4LVYf7kZ+ah7IeDiOj2vhEUn+jiA/3D/lVflCu6j2zPkL/adpBUdrdWDU668BN za7XhNEmV1zCpv5t8n05IzDBUZmDyZkckGyuaJrH2//4AVzV3quboNPSlVYd3p0DAJrYZc wM13N7CpizDsUQ1e+abRYwjafP5ZiKgkPMialpzeGOPNTx/w08rjY7HcXftngg== Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8084:d6bb:510:a966:d3d6:9789:8d0a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: melifaro/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QQ11K59Vvz15KD; Mon, 22 May 2023 15:03:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from melifaro@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\)) Subject: Re: builworld fails due to error in af_inet.c From: Alexander Chernikov In-Reply-To: <20230522170000.25468c5f@ernst.home> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:03:37 +0100 Cc: current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1B5092E2-27AB-45B7-B726-F83B6986638D@FreeBSD.org> References: <20230522170000.25468c5f@ernst.home> To: garyj@gmx.de X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1) X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Sorry for the breakage (and thanks for markj@ for the prompt fix) > On 22 May 2023, at 16:00, Gary Jennejohn wrote: >=20 > I just ran buildworld using the latest current source. >=20 > It dies due to this error in line 385 of = /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/af_inet.c: >=20 > static void > warn_nomask(ifflags) >=20 > The compiler really doesn't like not seeing a type for ifflags and = bails > out as the result. >=20 > Strangely enough, in_proc() a few lines later clearly has int ifflags = in > its list of variables. >=20 > Setting ifflags to int in warn_nomask() fixes the build. >=20 > Wasn't this compile tested before it was committed? It was & it didn=E2=80=99t yell on my setup. >=20 > -- > Gary Jennejohn >=20