Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : error: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated ... in C
- Reply: FreeBSD User : "Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : error: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated ... in C"
- In reply to: FreeBSD User : "Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : error: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated ... in C"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:13:49 UTC
> On 8. Mar 2023, at 11:42, FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> wrote: > > Am Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:28:11 +0100 > Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> schrieb: > >> On 8 Mar 2023, at 11:19, FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> wrote: >> ... >>> But I don't understand why the make environment is trying to compile a piece of code that >>> is disabled via "nodevice" as shown in my initial report herein: >>> >>> [...] >>> src/sys/dev/an/if_an_pci.c:143:1: error: a function definition without a prototype is >>> deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C2x >>> [-Werror,-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] >>> [...] >> >> The "nodevice" is for your custom kernel configuration, but as far as I >> can see an(4) is still built as a module, see sys/modules/Makefile: >> >> ... >> .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "i386" || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64" >> _agp= agp >> _an= an >> >> -Dimitry >> > > Oh, I'm sorry, > my fault in logic! > > Is there a "knob" to explicitely disable that specific module from being built from a point of > view of a user like me (not touching the base build system)? Use WITHOUT_MODULES=an in /etc/make.conf Best regards Michael > > -- > O. Hartmann