From nobody Sat Mar 04 19:35:02 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PTZn40tlPz3wNDT for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2023 19:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PTZn30trsz3xd7 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2023 19:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net; dmarc=none Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.17.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 324JZ3N3043193 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Mar 2023 11:35:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.17.1/8.15.2/Submit) id 324JZ31k043192; Sat, 4 Mar 2023 11:35:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 11:35:02 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: David Wolfskill Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making -current machines accept mail from sendmail Message-ID: <20230304193502.GA43158@www.zefox.net> References: <20230304184837.GA42823@www.zefox.net> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.99 / 15.00]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.894]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PTZn30trsz3xd7 X-Spamd-Bar: / X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 10:57:59AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > You might start with checking the output of "sockstat -l" on the machine > that is intended to receive the mail: SMTP is expected to be on 25/tcp. > > If the intended recipient machine does NOT show that 25/tcp is being > listened to, you will need to (install &) start a process to do so. > That may well involve installing (& starting) some MTA -- whether > sendmail, postfix, exim, or even qmail (or something else). > > (I expect that nothing is listening on 25/tcp, as that is what > "connection refused" implies.) > Indeed, that's the case. It looks as if dma isn't intended to replace sendmail, so I'll take the hint in UPDATING and turn sendmail back on. Thank you! bob prohaska