From nobody Wed Feb 15 14:48:29 2023
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PH1D02p5Gz3qQ8N
	for <freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jamie@catflap.org)
Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:300:2185:123::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PH1D00XHDz3JrR
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jamie@catflap.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Catflap-Envelope-From: <jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49])
	by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 31FEmT4Y025970;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:29 GMT
	(envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net)
Received: (from jamie@localhost)
	by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id 31FEmT6s025969;
	Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:29 GMT
	(envelope-from jamie)
From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@catflap.org>
Message-Id: <202302151448.31FEmT6s025969@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:29 +0000
Organization: Dyslexic Fish
To: jamie@catflap.org, imp@bsdimp.com
Cc: mjguzik@gmail.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 1 year src-patch anniversary!
References: <202301292218.30TMIQmM020883@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
 <CAGudoHE8AwfTvWT=65yTgLam5__69Zwtu4_k=p2sNwdLY7_XqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <202302151411.31FEBJhh024307@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net>
 <CANCZdfrFRZLeV0qcfGFWZFpn6SXPAYvhOwmWOC2dSGu24LL6=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrFRZLeV0qcfGFWZFpn6SXPAYvhOwmWOC2dSGu24LL6=w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-current+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-current+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [104.207.135.49]); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:48:29 +0000 (GMT)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PH1D00XHDz3JrR
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0::/38, country:US]
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:

> Bugzilla is inefficient for small patches.

Yes, I can see that bugzilla is unsuitable for things like that.

> I'm trying an experiment on github: any smallish, almost ready patches will
> be landed, redirected or rejected quickly

Thanks Warner! That sounds great! - I'll be taking you up on that!

Another thing - my last port maintainer update was converted to a phabricator
post, as was the recent patch that delphij committed.

Should I have posted them there instead to save the committers time?
I always thought new phabricator posts were for committers
only, as it seems to me to be a way for committers to get their code
reviewed and passed prior to committing.

Cheers, Jamie