From nobody Thu Apr 13 22:36:20 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PyDvc4YVbz44n6F; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.dawidek.net (mail.dawidek.net [94.130.64.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PyDvc1qhwz4MyD; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pjd@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from [10.20.1.26] (211.188.237.160.cyberhome.jp [160.237.188.211]) by mail.dawidek.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B4EF4F63E; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 00:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <060e8793-cca7-9301-57ac-9c73a187db3f@dawidek.net> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:36:20 +0900 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: git: 2a58b312b62f - main - zfs: merge openzfs/zfs@431083f75 To: Shawn Webb , Cy Schubert Cc: Mateusz Guzik , Mark Millard , vishwin@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org, Current FreeBSD References: <20230413071032.18BFF31F@slippy.cwsent.com> <20230413063321.60344b1f@cschubert.com> <20230413135635.6B62F354@slippy.cwsent.com> <20230413140504.nnm23cjjv65mwzjr@mutt-hbsd> Content-Language: en-US From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20230413140504.nnm23cjjv65mwzjr@mutt-hbsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PyDvc1qhwz4MyD X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:94.130.0.0/16, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 4/13/23 23:05, Shawn Webb wrote: > I've learned over the years downstream that it's not really my place > to tell upstream what to do or how to do it. However, I think given > the seriousness of this, upstream might do well to revert the commit > until a solid fix is in place. Upstream might want to consider the > impacts this is having not just with downstream projects, but also > regular users. > > Really bad timing to have a lot of new tax documentation that I really > don't want to lose. I'd really like to have an up-to-date, security > patched OS, but I guess I'll stay behind so that I don't risk losing > critical financial documentation. Shawn, I'm working on a patch to safely revert this that would also work for people who already upgraded their pools. I'm sorry for this mess. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek