Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)

Hi,

> Am 09.11.2022 um 22:05 schrieb Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>:
> Attention, "upgrade" is overloaded here. "OS upgrade" will not render the pool unbootable (modulo bugs), but "zpool upgrade rpool" will (except we have provisions that zpool upgrade doesn't enable all features in case the bootfs property is set).

And we are back at the start. The "problem" is that I really like consistency.
So when "zpool status" throws that ominous message at me - any you have
to admit that it is phrased like a warning - I want simply to get rid of that.
After a reasonable after-update grace period.

But during our discussion I have come to wonder:

- I upgrade from 13.0 to 13.1, I do a "zpool upgrade" afterwards, I also upgrade the boot loader

- I install 13.1 with ZFS

What is the difference? Shouldn't these two imaginary systems be absolutely the same in terms
of ZFS features, boot loader, and all that?

Kind regards,
Patrick