Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- In reply to: Patrick M. Hausen: "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:58:46 UTC
Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" <pmh@hausen.com> (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:49:37 +0100): > Hi, > >> Am 09.11.2022 um 20:45 schrieb Alexander Leidinger >> <Alexander@leidinger.net>: >> But "zpool set feature@edonr=enabled rpool" (or any other feature >> not in the list we talk about) would render it unbootable. > > Sorry, just to be sure. So an active change of e.g. checksum or > compression algorithm > might render the system unbootable but a zpool upgrade never will? > At least not intentionally? ;-) If you mean "zpool upgrade", then no (modulo bugs). OpenZFS uses the feature flags instead of zpool upgrade. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF