Re: Loader can't find /boot/ua/loader.lua on UFS after main-n255828-18054d0220c
- In reply to: Jeffrey Bouquet: "Re: Loader can't find /boot/ua/loader.lua on UFS after main-n255828-18054d0220c"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:03:09 UTC
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 4:33 AM Jeffrey Bouquet <jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 29 May 2022 18:26:03 -0700, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> > wrote: > > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 06:59:34PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > Sorry for top posting... > > > > > > Did you upgrade your boot blocks? > > > > Thanks for the reply! > > > > Hmmm.... Well, every time I rebuild FreeBSD head, the last step > > just after "make installworld" and before the reboot is: > > > > # gpart bootcode -b /boot/boot /dev/ada0s4 > > > > So *those* get updated. > > > > I haven't updated from /boot/boot0 recently (and have a requirement that > > whatever is in the MBR is able to boot stable/12, stable/13, and head). > > > > Is updating (from head's /boot/bot0) recommended at this point? > > > .... > > > > (And in case it wasn't obvious, I made a silly typo in the Subject; it > > should have read: > > > > | Subject: Re: Loader can't find /boot/lua/loader.lua on UFS after > > | main-n255828-18054d0220c > > > > Sorry: I don't have loader messages showing up on serial console on that > > machine at this point, so I had hand-typed it from memory and managed to > > elide a letter.) > > > > Peace, > > david > > -- > > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > > "Putin is a paranoid dictator. Putin must go. He started a senseless war > > and is leading Russia into a ditch." - Egor Polyakov & Alexandra > Miroshnikova > > > > See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. > > > I've never heard of that. Why isnt it in UPDATING? Re updating boot blocks: It's not a requirement. It's a diagnostic question to see what code we're dealing with. The only time it's been required was the ZFS update to OpenZFS after a zpool upgrade because the latter introduced new features the old boot blocks would reject as being a valid ZFS that it recognized. Warner