Re: nvme INVALID_FIELD in dmesg.boot
- In reply to: Alexander Motin : "Re: nvme INVALID_FIELD in dmesg.boot"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 14:32:05 UTC
> On May 25, 2022, at 9:58 AM, Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > On 25.05.2022 08:25, Matteo Riondato wrote: >> My dmesg.boot contains the following entries containing "INVALID_FIELD" about nvme (I use nda(4) for my nvme disks, with hw.nvme.use_nvd=0 in loader.conf): >> trismegistus ~ % grep -e 'nvme[0-9]\?' /var/run/dmesg.boot >> nvme0: <Intel DC PC4500> mem 0xb8610000-0xb8613fff irq 40 at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci7 >> nvme1: <Intel DC PC4500> mem 0xb8510000-0xb8513fff irq 47 at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci8 >> nvme2: <Intel DC PC4500> mem 0xc5e10000-0xc5e13fff irq 48 at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci10 >> nvme3: <Intel DC PC4500> mem 0xc5d10000-0xc5d13fff irq 55 at device 0.0 numa-domain 0 on pci11 >> nvme0: SET FEATURES (09) sqid:0 cid:15 nsid:0 cdw10:0000000b cdw11:0000031f >> nvme0: INVALID_FIELD (00/02) sqid:0 cid:15 cdw0:0 >> nvme1: SET FEATURES (09) sqid:0 cid:15 nsid:0 cdw10:0000000b cdw11:0000031f >> nvme1: INVALID_FIELD (00/02) sqid:0 cid:15 cdw0:0 >> nvme2: SET FEATURES (09) sqid:0 cid:15 nsid:0 cdw10:0000000b cdw11:0000031f >> nvme2: INVALID_FIELD (00/02) sqid:0 cid:15 cdw0:0 >> nvme3: SET FEATURES (09) sqid:0 cid:15 nsid:0 cdw10:0000000b cdw11:0000031f >> nvme3: INVALID_FIELD (00/02) sqid:0 cid:15 cdw0:0 >> nda0 at nvme0 bus 0 scbus16 target 0 lun 1 >> nda0: nvme version 1.2 x4 (max x4) lanes PCIe Gen3 (max Gen3) link >> nda1 at nvme1 bus 0 scbus17 target 0 lun 1 >> nda1: nvme version 1.2 x4 (max x4) lanes PCIe Gen3 (max Gen3) link >> nda2 at nvme2 bus 0 scbus18 target 0 lun 1 >> nda2: nvme version 1.2 x4 (max x4) lanes PCIe Gen3 (max Gen3) link >> nda3 at nvme3 bus 0 scbus19 target 0 lun 1 >> nda3: nvme version 1.2 x4 (max x4) lanes PCIe Gen3 (max Gen3) link >> The disks seem to work fine, from what I can tell. >> Are the "INVALID_FIELD" messages harmless, or can they be avoided with some tuning, or maybe with some patch? > > Those messages mean that driver tried to enable certain types of asynchronous events, but probably the hardware does not support some of those. If you wish to experiment we could try to mask some of the bits in nvme_ctrlr_configure_aer() function to find out which one exactly, but for discontinued drives 4-5 years old it might not have too much sense. It should not be critical unless you either overheat them, or somehow else they fail and wish to report it. Thank you, Alexander. One question though: the messages report that the driver tried to set (?) cdw10 and cdw11, but the INVALID_FIELD is about cdw0 (sorry, I have no idea what these “cwd” mean). Is that expected? Unrelated? (The disks are Intel DC P4510, I don’t know how long they’ve been around) Thanks, Matteo