Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity"
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity"
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 12:06:24 UTC
On Fri, 21 May 2021 08:36:49 -0600 Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:38 AM Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> > wrote: > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:57:17PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > No, I don’t think there’s any reason to default it differently on > > > stable > > vs > > > current. I think it’s useful (and I prefer the more verbose form, > > > which isn’t the default). > > > > I agree that there's no reason for the default to be different, but > > I would say that it is much easier for someone who knows that there > > is a default to be changed to change it, than it is for someone who > > does not. Therefore, if the information is not useful to someone > > who does not know how to get rid of it, then it should default to > > not being displayed, IMHO. > > > > I plan on changing the default for non-INVARIANT kernels back to > the old behavior. > > INVARIANT kernels will keep this behavior because it's a debugging > kernel and this is one more thing to help debugging problems. > Did this ever happen? I just installed a fresh 13.1-RELEASE production system (non-INVARIANT kernel) and it seems like SIGINFO still outputs kernel stack information. Cheers Michael -- Michael Gmelin