Re: ampere3 activity is not showing up on https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package
- Reply: Ronald Klop : "Re: ampere3 activity is not showing up on https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package"
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: ampere3 activity is not showing up on https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package"
- In reply to: Philip Paeps : "Re: ampere3 activity is not showing up on https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 05:44:29 UTC
On 2022-Jun-13, at 22:14, Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2022-06-13 00:16:55 (+0800), Mark Millard wrote: >> ampere3's activity is not showing up on the page: >> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package >> >> but: >> >> http://ampere3.nyi.freebsd.org/#latest_builds >> and: >> http://ampere3.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=130arm64-default&build=b44e82e7d313 >> >> shows a currently active build (but with only 2 ports remaining). > > pkg-status.freebsd.org is maintained on GitHub, outside the clusteradm automation. I sent in this patch a couple of months ago, when I set up ampere3: > > https://github.com/bdrewery/pkg-status.freebsd.org/pull/12/files > > This was merged last week but it doesn't look like there's any automation to keep the running infrastructure in sync with that repository. There were some reassuring screams in a logfile after I chanted some incantations in a the jail running pkg-status.freebsd.org. > > Let me know if that fixed it. > Well, I now see 34 builds that were via ampere3. This was via use of: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/?all=1&type=package They go back to 2022-Feb-26, with the most recent still in progress (371 remaining). Thanks. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com