From nobody Tue Aug 30 15:39:48 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MHBMC0mW3z4Zkk1 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MHBMC0Cb1z3xvR; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1661873991; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ItNzVMSjTwJUQ8dOal+/NAlKlT1qJeAoPAHsUNNifBs=; b=C56DGy42LVGp0JDpAGMgZA93O1IxwOXxdTmsbkTkNBS0mBJa4keebHyCnX9ALWmTs2eHd0 LuPtal6SnI8d117q96oLeJ6s/063ohIAJtu3fBb2+fuCGUKSdpttcjmkHU/AUdAg4w+53o N7Apuaqwevp/rYYx8xSjCGOczv389ePkDBSrQ5C/X+0ahIyxspH4cBt1Qy6wSEdTnFw6oJ 5FwbjIa8HF6CnBW9eHpqOr9Wud7DeigalWc05EQg1oeCaQzGIFOzpoYZ5VhVQ+oQ62yTRJ XAZtL3r682VSkvalJAhmcfzAf8baigeBRshKaLyzUDT1kQ+17P2A66Ccu0IMew== Received: from [172.21.4.170] (dynamic-177-53-82-16.telecominternet.net.br [177.53.82.16]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: garga) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MHBMB2cnvz1Njl; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:39:48 -0300 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0 Subject: Re: archivers/arj fails to build on jail Content-Language: en-US To: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen , Current FreeBSD Cc: erdgeist@erdgeist.org References: <9636d41e-bf21-8130-ff15-e5dcbaaa4fe8@FreeBSD.org> <430844d1-ae2f-90d2-eec7-646c848e084f@FreeBSD.org> <74388082-ea84-564c-44ee-f1a568b75d5b@FreeBSD.org> From: Renato Botelho In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1661873991; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ItNzVMSjTwJUQ8dOal+/NAlKlT1qJeAoPAHsUNNifBs=; b=x7/W/IQCRgxMrD+ci1HekxtThqVz/EsknQMUXLoMEibymcMH9vIB55PFo2AigBbUVoy+kI BuXIi3x/FCVy2H+ATCNgl9dflVtT7Kg0Nl4r2fO+JlnwHNTZKGMqQYAXWD08T4NxcfFebP fkLNXvN2frSbiS+GjZ3jhgssDo3yRSbGgpB++xN8yz9uxkzlx9CzPcMPrFe9yCbicApeUs P/sDDCNA/Bkqkgw7tMBTaQ8L6OU2dpTDU/M+FVZY1L3w/pcWcKCp/sQXENCsQCDOR1brfN /Z//I91paVRWzV9pYR8P58iWi7jra2ME2trV/r18qQ9t1mOE2duUjC+kquS4Ww== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1661873991; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MGiZ3eBMz7mQCftqOSrDU5bK934mj0EFcyGQM0uSBzAmcaK+8hqKX3QDm6pqCuG8T4Id7w PqiJ3Vy9cih80FdTDTdih64RIKTeQsJhk1agW+B8VELJmM8T1azBcJGqlJxT+DDOsyJBND cxpI3pRQTgtDZrw0pypdj8Fp4YZulFldmHy5xSxwk35cnAB2/OAFbmeF4VWq+MLdwGx2uV TkRogmFseSd8ENgytzt2+jYgwaQ2SbRCjIz1KarzTtltMSps/SoRMKfMZomNqyfaR11fJ6 AnjxA5Z/h4j+gyTswgTziFJONWZFBwud1U2vOBoO5HEpVBk0G85UrbO4RrNM0g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 30/08/22 11:35, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote: > > On 30.08.2022 13.17, Renato Botelho wrote: >> On 29/08/22 20:32, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 29.08.2022 17.29, Renato Botelho wrote: >>>> There is a PR [1] opened for years reporting arj fails to build on a >>>> jail.  Recently I reproduced it on a system running CURRENT. >>>> >>>> I just launched a jail and tried to build it, and got the error as >>>> described: >>> Did you use ezjail? >>> >>> I tried to replicate and I think the error is triggered by >>> the nullfs usage of ezjail. I copied the settings of ezjail without >>> nullfs usage (using the basejail as path adding etc from the failing >>> jail to it and removing the fstab from jail.conf) and arj did get a >>> working msgbind. >> >> Yes, I also use ezjail.  I'm cc'ing ezjail's maintainer to see if we >> can get some advice. >> >> Thanks! >> > Hi again. > > > I narrowed this down to  symlinks ,wiithin the jail, to the nullfs > mountpoint. > > Replacing symlinks to the basejail mount point with dirs and setting > this in the fstab of the jail > > and msgbind is a valid executable > > /usr/jails/basejail/bin /usr/jails/test1/bin nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/boot /usr/jails/test1/boot nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/lib /usr/jails/test1/lib nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/libexec /usr/jails/test1/libexec nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/rescue /usr/jails/test1/rescue nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/sbin /usr/jails/test1/sbin nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/bin /usr/jails/test1/usr/bin nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/lib /usr/jails/test1/usr/lib nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/include /usr/jails/test1/usr/include nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/lib32 /usr/jails/test1/usr/lib32 nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/ports /usr/jails/test1/usr/ports nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/libdata /usr/jails/test1/usr/libdata nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/sbin /usr/jails/test1/usr/sbin nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/share /usr/jails/test1/usr/share nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/libexec /usr/jails/test1/usr/libexec nullfs ro 0 0 > /usr/jails/basejail/usr/src /usr/jails/test1/usr/src nullfs ro 0 0 > > It should be further narrowed down but nullfs alone is not the issue. Interesting. And just to add a note here, I copied msgbind from jail to host and tried to execute it to confirm binary was really bad and I got the same Abort trap message. -- Renato Botelho