From nobody Mon Sep 06 20:40:21 2021
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DCC17ADA79
	for <freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Sep 2021 20:40:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H3KzN59lCz4dYc
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Sep 2021 20:40:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94.2 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <pi@freebsd.org>)
	id 1mNLPh-000NRD-61; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 22:40:21 +0200
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 22:40:21 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BUG in libm's powf
Message-ID: <YTZ8tTO5eo9660RC@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20210906152836.GA86615@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <01D81389-45D1-4278-8DC1-7995D34D0276@FreeBSD.org>
 <20210906175318.GA87474@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <AAA24AAD-86C5-4736-AD0C-EFBCA3FA59B2@FreeBSD.org>
 <20210906180459.GA87487@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
 <AAC47D81-C45E-45E0-A7F5-543BCBBA811F@gmail.com>
 <20210906203526.GA88286@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-current+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-current+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210906203526.GA88286@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H3KzN59lCz4dYc
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	 REPLY(-4.00)[]
X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N

Hi!

> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:22:02PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote:
> > could you turn to test program into an AFT test to prevent further regressions?
> 
> I cannot tell if you are addressing Mark or me.
> For me, I know nothing about ATF.

man 7 atf

has more details.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    Now what ?