Re: Future of ident(1)
- Reply: Slawa Olhovchenkov : "Re: Future of ident(1)"
- In reply to: Steve Kargl : "Future of ident(1)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:47:18 UTC
Just in case someone thinks this is something useful, I've got a PR filed against git to implement custom $Id$. There are no technical issues with the change but Git developers are not very keen on merging it in, since they see this as an obscure feature, no one needs. :-/ So if anyone wants to chime in on GitHub or git mailing list please do so. https://github.com/git/git/pull/1074 Thanks! -Max On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 2:30 PM Steve Kargl < sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > All, > > With the new world order, what is the future of ident(1)? > Should it be removed from base? Given a compiled binary > in base, how does one find the equivalent git info that > ident(1) used to perform? > > Having a few minutes to dust off old patchs for libm, should > I remove $FreeBSD$ tags in files I touch? For new files, is > it expected that useless $FreeBSD$ tags should be added? > > -- > Steve > >