Re: Future of ident(1)
- Reply: Steve Kargl : "Re: Future of ident(1)"
- In reply to: Steve Kargl : "Future of ident(1)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 21:51:15 UTC
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 3:30 PM Steve Kargl < sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > All, > > With the new world order, what is the future of ident(1)? > Should it be removed from base? Given a compiled binary > in base, how does one find the equivalent git info that > ident(1) used to perform? > It is useful for some rare cases, but in general those cases likely can likely be handled by readelf / elfdump and adding build info to the files. I tendto think it's time to retire ident(1), but I'm in no hurry. > > Having a few minutes to dust off old patchs for libm, should > I remove $FreeBSD$ tags in files I touch? No. The current rule is that we're not removing $FreeBSD$ as we touch files. The plan is to remove it wholesale in the future. This gives maximum flexibility because stable/12 is still built out of svn and you never know what might get MFC'd there. > For new files, is > it expected that useless $FreeBSD$ tags should be added? > If you plan to or expet to merge the new file to stable/12, then yes. Otherwise omit $FreeBSD$. Most new files won't likely be merged to 12 and even if you make an error in judgement and a new file without $FreeBSD$ is merged to 12, the impact is going to be minimal. Warner