From nobody Fri Nov 26 16:06:09 2021 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C218BD5C7 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J103Z2lJ5z3mDq; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id gu12so7542923qvb.6; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:06:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=/kgpnakEBG0cl2Rf4k8x116LJgeJfrJkmOfseA+38Xg=; b=JfudS64+eB7TQyhu5YTNgWBQhkobSeXSALJt0U7fX7CP9U/5jKcGKu7hkcbbRkg8WA ooVrmR5U5iYKDnl1dhvAHUHH0CniRONMRC1iJLM0nHVzcouH1I4W1kqyF03P2PHHAmEP LXTKK6cKrqD8r9WyJMg0vwnevBJRLezDx0vPoh7bk1g1buyZ9Nnc74u2iGutY5hfi/oJ ek3xNDmdcIm9DzSTcFKBBpnLpUd+IfMUDLopzrUNTWR95BjtmWT87VZZZs90riTsPQGP YSA0QBwl58uq2FyjNTsMjSUjLiXU+/4j8V5fNtRdpH9Kc/KGqLb3h0nRDD5GB/qlHx2h mWVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=/kgpnakEBG0cl2Rf4k8x116LJgeJfrJkmOfseA+38Xg=; b=SH3sSB8MyFjbolOORXIh6bmsTGQbJBmIQPRhU9rTE9QjQwPJaEMyyrfm4/aNqJzSh4 4c80WGcabPvqQmcgi5uvV8wlsSX78qL5ftm3xxSiVHvCwIjDcofuzlMfUcC9ibDEYPZB C4m2UjJK5d1DYflCS3+KbOm05jSrrQOS8ZsOfSqFYFFoBCgLPxDQg68A4dIxG5TEaI0n gN6bV65Ua0VFXqzsDiuK9YnXhuNjYqII0vEcs9d+VcHosKknildf7+voxRab3NH5i0KP tGoHCH3TV5KkPJnHpku/Fdq4xsBLwDev2yidGp9em+m8MiU42cxwHo/OUDbcWv0OWH5t PoUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+dwVdpwZZ4rqlz3k/Zh4C/S7hnIAXoAJobVdFiSHOtnR1vwPC Q+WVAUcoWEhvQ3/JEpEwWs3+MxCMVZI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUFLLf8UgvnryzUQCNlibVYhORJTSAyV2eJ9vMQ8HJi8iR1L60aqn3w7SPRPMB9QN6XdaX9A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:15c6:: with SMTP id p6mr25656925qvz.12.1637942771445; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:06:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from nuc ([142.126.186.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bp18sm3359660qkb.39.2021.11.26.08.06.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:06:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:06:09 -0500 From: Mark Johnston To: Andriy Gapon Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: ctfconvert: rc = 1 Unsupported version [_dwarf_info_load(229)] Message-ID: References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J103Z2lJ5z3mDq X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:48:36PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I've just finished builds of yesterday's CURRENT / main for arm and arm64. > In both builds I got lots of messages from ctfconvert: > ctfconvert: rc = 1 Unsupported version [_dwarf_info_load(229)] > > I got an impression that there was a message for each object file, that's how > many of them were there. > > I don't recall seeing those messages before. > > Should I be concerned? > Maybe I am doing something wrong or have an unusual configuration? > Any way to fix the issue? > > Thanks! > > P.S. > The builds were done on stable/13, so maybe there is an issue with host tools > not being able to grok something new. I haven't seen this before, for what it's worth. I presume this is from a kernel build? Does the configuration enable generation of debug info with, e.g., "makeoptions DEBUG=-g"?