Re: OpenZFS imports, status update
- Reply: tech-lists : "Re: OpenZFS imports, status update"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 23:02:15 UTC
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Michael Tuexen < michael.tuexen@macmic.franken.de> wrote: > > On 9. Jun 2021, at 00:52, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > > > Top posting... > > > > You can do a 'git remote purge freebsd' to reset the branch names, then > > you'll be able to do a normal pull. > Do you mean 'git remote prune freebsd'? > Yes. Should have cut and paste instead of retyping it :( Warner > Best regards > Michael > > > > Thanks for the feedback > > > > Warner > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:10 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-git < > > freebsd-git@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu_at_freebsd.org> wrote (in part) on > >> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:29:51 +0800 : > >> > >>> The people have local branch tracking the original vendor/openzfs will > >>> encounter issues like this whey doing `git pull`: > >>> > >>> error: cannot lock ref > >>> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy': > >>> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create > >>> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy' > >>> > >>> The solution is update the upstream of the tracking branch: > >>> > >>> (change "freebsd" to "origin" if you use default remote name) > >>> git update-ref -d refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs > >>> git branch -u freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy vendor/openzfs/legacy > >> > >> I guess I misunderstood the meaning of the wording. > >> I've never explicitly created a branch of or checked out > >> anything from vendor/ or below. So I was not expecting > >> anything. I do use main and stable/13 and releng/13.0 > >> explicitly in worktrees, no local commits involved for > >> the context that this is from. > >> > >> Looks like some implicit initial configuration defaults > >> mean "local branch tracking" of vendor/openzfs was > >> implicitly/automatically in use in a way that fits > >> the actual intent of the wording: > >> > >> # git fetch > >> remote: Enumerating objects: 21551, done. > >> remote: Counting objects: 100% (21551/21551), done. > >> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (152/152), done. > >> remote: Total 75711 (delta 21460), reused 21399 (delta 21399), > pack-reused > >> 54160 > >> Receiving objects: 100% (75711/75711), 46.02 MiB | 4.74 MiB/s, done. > >> Resolving deltas: 100% (59104/59104), completed with 2449 local objects. > >> From https://git.FreeBSD.org/src > >> e5f5b6a75c0a..f20893853e8e main -> > >> freebsd/main > >> a4deddc0de32..53de482ad419 releng/11.4 -> > >> freebsd/releng/11.4 > >> f5ddeabc08e7..6e927d10c587 releng/12.2 -> > >> freebsd/releng/12.2 > >> 8023e729a521..b74cdf1eceae releng/13.0 -> > >> freebsd/releng/13.0 > >> dbb3df26a8a3..90e161ec6d11 stable/11 -> > >> freebsd/stable/11 > >> f146c0338c6c..0a41a2899eb2 stable/12 -> > >> freebsd/stable/12 > >> ddd0a8bffe35..04c4bd7f7b52 stable/13 -> > >> freebsd/stable/13 > >> 1e02e5b0ba86..395770967c36 vendor/acpica -> > >> freebsd/vendor/acpica > >> error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy': > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy' > >> ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/legacy -> > >> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy (unable to update local ref) > >> error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master': > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master' > >> ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/master -> > >> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master (unable to update local ref) > >> error: cannot lock ref > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release': > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create > >> 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release' > >> ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release -> > >> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release (unable to update local ref) > >> efec8223892b..40c7ff83e74e vendor/wpa -> > >> freebsd/vendor/wpa > >> * [new tag] vendor/acpica/20210604 -> > >> vendor/acpica/20210604 > >> > >> So, for now, I then did: > >> > >> # git update-ref -d refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs > >> # git fetch > >> From https://git.FreeBSD.org/src > >> * [new branch] vendor/openzfs/legacy -> > >> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy > >> * [new branch] vendor/openzfs/master -> > >> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master > >> * [new branch] vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release -> > >> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release > >> > >> This order was apparently a mistake in some way because > >> after it I then tried the other of the pair of commands > >> and got: > >> > >> # git branch -u freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy vendor/openzfs/legacy > >> fatal: branch 'vendor/openzfs/legacy' does not exist > >> > >> Yet what I see is: > >> > >> # git remote show freebsd > >> * remote freebsd > >> Fetch URL: https://git.FreeBSD.org/src.git > >> Push URL: https://git.FreeBSD.org/src.git > >> HEAD branch: main > >> Remote branches: > >> main tracked > >> refs/notes/commits tracked > >> . . . > >> releng/13.0 tracked > >> . . . > >> stable/13 tracked > >> . . . > >> vendor/openzfs/legacy tracked > >> vendor/openzfs/master tracked > >> vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release tracked > >> . . . > >> Local branches configured for 'git pull': > >> main merges with remote main > >> releng/13.0 merges with remote releng/13.0 > >> stable/13 merges with remote stable/13 > >> > >> So I'm not sure if I have anything that is messed up > >> or not. Nothing looks odd to me, other than the one > >> command's output. > >> > >> > >> Overall it seems that most people not doing something > >> special with an initial git configuration for FreeBSD > >> so have to deal with the issue at hand explicitly in > >> some way. > >> > >> === > >> Mark Millard > >> marklmi at yahoo.com > >> ( dsl-only.net went > >> away in early 2018-Mar) > >> > >> > >> > >