Re: OpenZFS imports, status update
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: OpenZFS imports, status update"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 22:09:54 UTC
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu_at_freebsd.org> wrote (in part) on Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 06:29:51 +0800 : > The people have local branch tracking the original vendor/openzfs will > encounter issues like this whey doing `git pull`: > > error: cannot lock ref > 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy': > 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create > 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy' > > The solution is update the upstream of the tracking branch: > > (change "freebsd" to "origin" if you use default remote name) > git update-ref -d refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs > git branch -u freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy vendor/openzfs/legacy I guess I misunderstood the meaning of the wording. I've never explicitly created a branch of or checked out anything from vendor/ or below. So I was not expecting anything. I do use main and stable/13 and releng/13.0 explicitly in worktrees, no local commits involved for the context that this is from. Looks like some implicit initial configuration defaults mean "local branch tracking" of vendor/openzfs was implicitly/automatically in use in a way that fits the actual intent of the wording: # git fetch remote: Enumerating objects: 21551, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (21551/21551), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (152/152), done. remote: Total 75711 (delta 21460), reused 21399 (delta 21399), pack-reused 54160 Receiving objects: 100% (75711/75711), 46.02 MiB | 4.74 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (59104/59104), completed with 2449 local objects. From https://git.FreeBSD.org/src e5f5b6a75c0a..f20893853e8e main -> freebsd/main a4deddc0de32..53de482ad419 releng/11.4 -> freebsd/releng/11.4 f5ddeabc08e7..6e927d10c587 releng/12.2 -> freebsd/releng/12.2 8023e729a521..b74cdf1eceae releng/13.0 -> freebsd/releng/13.0 dbb3df26a8a3..90e161ec6d11 stable/11 -> freebsd/stable/11 f146c0338c6c..0a41a2899eb2 stable/12 -> freebsd/stable/12 ddd0a8bffe35..04c4bd7f7b52 stable/13 -> freebsd/stable/13 1e02e5b0ba86..395770967c36 vendor/acpica -> freebsd/vendor/acpica error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy': 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy' ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/legacy -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy (unable to update local ref) error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master': 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master' ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/master -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master (unable to update local ref) error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release': 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release' ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release (unable to update local ref) efec8223892b..40c7ff83e74e vendor/wpa -> freebsd/vendor/wpa * [new tag] vendor/acpica/20210604 -> vendor/acpica/20210604 So, for now, I then did: # git update-ref -d refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs # git fetch From https://git.FreeBSD.org/src * [new branch] vendor/openzfs/legacy -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy * [new branch] vendor/openzfs/master -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master * [new branch] vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release This order was apparently a mistake in some way because after it I then tried the other of the pair of commands and got: # git branch -u freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy vendor/openzfs/legacy fatal: branch 'vendor/openzfs/legacy' does not exist Yet what I see is: # git remote show freebsd * remote freebsd Fetch URL: https://git.FreeBSD.org/src.git Push URL: https://git.FreeBSD.org/src.git HEAD branch: main Remote branches: main tracked refs/notes/commits tracked . . . releng/13.0 tracked . . . stable/13 tracked . . . vendor/openzfs/legacy tracked vendor/openzfs/master tracked vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release tracked . . . Local branches configured for 'git pull': main merges with remote main releng/13.0 merges with remote releng/13.0 stable/13 merges with remote stable/13 So I'm not sure if I have anything that is messed up or not. Nothing looks odd to me, other than the one command's output. Overall it seems that most people not doing something special with an initial git configuration for FreeBSD so have to deal with the issue at hand explicitly in some way. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)