Re: Building multiple kernels with "make release"
- Reply: Glen Barber : "Re: Building multiple kernels with "make release""
- In reply to: Glen Barber : "Re: Building multiple kernels with "make release""
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:05:25 UTC
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:57 AM Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:32:03PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:30:44AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:28 AM Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:26:50PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:11:48AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > > Is it possible to build multiple different kernels and include > them > > > > all in > > > > > > a release image? release.conf says so. But from experiment, > what I > > > > see is > > > > > > that: > > > > > > > > > > > > * release.sh does pass both kernels in the KERNCONF variable to > "make > > > > > > buildkernel" > > > > > > * "make buildkernel" dutifully builds both > > > > > > * BUT, "make installkernel" only installs the first kernel and > ignores > > > > the > > > > > > rest > > > > > > * Only the first kernel ends up in the final image > > > > > > * It's not really clear where an alternate kernel should go, > anyway. > > > > > > Probably someplace like /boot/kernel.debug , but release.conf > doesn't > > > > > > provide a way to specify that. > > > > > > > > > > > > So is the "multiple kernels in release.conf" feature > unfinished? If > > > > so, > > > > > > does anybody have a good idea about the best way to finish it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/7045b1603bdf054145dd958a4acc17b410fb62a0/release/release.conf.sample#L32 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Last I was aware, based on a patch sent to me privately, I > believe, it > > > > > should work. > > > > > > > > > > Let me take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, wait. Are you using 'make release' or release/release.sh? > > > > > > > > > > I'm using release.sh. I thought that was just a wrapper for "make > > > release". > > > > It is, I just want to make sure I'm looking in the right place(s). > > > > Just on a hunch, could you try with adding INSTALLKERNEL="${KERNEL}" to > your release.conf? > > I now seem to recall some weirdness with this, but the exact details > elude me at the moment. > > Glen > Setting INSTALLKERNEL="GENERIC-NODEBUG" during "make installkernel" overrides whatever KERNCONF was set to. But it still only installs one kernel. Trying to set that variable to a list doesn't work. -Alan