Re: Any Cronyx Tau* (ce(4) or cp(4)) users ?
- Reply: Gleb Smirnoff : "Re: Any Cronyx Tau* (ce(4) or cp(4)) users ?"
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff : "Re: Any Cronyx Tau* (ce(4) or cp(4)) users ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:30:41 UTC
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:54 AM Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > Emmanuel, > > look at this communication: > > E> And we're doing that just because the drivers compiles ? > G> We are doing that because the hardware is still produced ... > E> ... a lot of obsolete hardware that we've removed are still produced ... > G> I'd be interested to see at least one example ... > E> This was an hypothetical situation. > > I don't know what to reply here. :( > The standards that Brooks, Ed and I have been using in retiring drivers has been "Still relevant to FreeBSD". Although whether or not something was still in production is an input into that, it's not the only factor in decisions made. While that standard is a bit vague, I'm struggling understanding the case for these drivers still being relevant to FreeBSD in the absence of documented actual use, let alone a use case that we can do a cost-benefit analysis on. Warner