Re: Building multiple kernels with "make release"
- Reply: Glen Barber : "Re: Building multiple kernels with "make release""
- In reply to: Emmanuel Vadot : "Re: Building multiple kernels with "make release""
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 20:10:23 UTC
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:43 PM Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:13:54 +0000 > Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 06:00:28PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 5:52 PM Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> > wrote: > > > > > > > On 28/07/2021 20:46, Juraj Lutter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 28 Jul 2021, at 20:37, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:05:25PM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > >>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:57 AM Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > > >>>> Just on a hunch, could you try with adding > INSTALLKERNEL="${KERNEL}" > > > > to > > > > >>>> your release.conf? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I now seem to recall some weirdness with this, but the exact > details > > > > >>>> elude me at the moment. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Setting INSTALLKERNEL="GENERIC-NODEBUG" during "make > installkernel" > > > > >>> overrides whatever KERNCONF was set to. But it still only > installs one > > > > >>> kernel. Trying to set that variable to a list doesn't work. > > > > >> > > > > >> Ok. Give me a day or so to try to figure out what is (or isn't) > > > > >> happening here. I do not recall any recent-ish changes that > would have > > > > >> caused this, and I am 95% certain it has worked in the past. > > > > > > > > > > According to Makefile.inc1: > > > > > > > > > > make installkernel KERNCONF=?KERN1 KERN2? > > > > > > > > > > should install KERN1 and KERN2. Similar goes for buildkernel. > > > > > > > > > > Or is there something I am missing? > > > > > > > > Does 'make installkernel KERNCONF=?KERN1 KERN2?' really install both > > > > kernels? Under which names? > > > > I have 3 kernels defined in KERNCONF in /etc/make.conf for years. 3 > > > > kernels are built by "make buildkernel" but only one installed by > "make > > > > installkernel". > > > > > > > > To install other kernels I use: > > > > > > > > make installkernel KERNCONF=KERN2 KODIR=/boot/kernel.KERN2 > > > > > > > > make installkernel KERNCONF=KERN3 KODIR=/boot/kernel.KERN3 > > > > > > > > > > Miroslav is right. Despite the comment that Juraj found, "make > > > installkernel" only installs the first kernel listed in KERNCONF. > > > > Good find. I honestly thought this worked as expected versus as > > written. In fact, I *thought* secondary, tertiary, etc. kernels were > > installed as /boot/kernel.KERN2, /boot/kernel.KERN3 (using the example > > above). > > You need to set NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no for that to happens (yes the > variable name and double no sucks if anyone have a patch for that that > would be awesome). > > > Although, I may be misremembering, and 'kernel.KERN2.txz' may be created > > instead, although not installed/extracted. Though, we are going back at > > least seven years, and I do not even remember what I had eaten for > > dinner last night, so there's that... > > > > Glen > > > > > -- > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@FreeBSD.org> > NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no works for "make installkernel". However, it still doesn't work with release.sh. It seems there is work left to do. -Alan