From nobody Thu Jan 02 02:52:59 2025 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YNrqL6lFNz5jsBV for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2025 02:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YNrqL3z03z4L1W for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 02:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1735786382; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XdUcUOoORKz9EVPZz1tD9sqKQkrudFwFIrtPUVRHdIU=; b=iJdlejl5urvYJfLzIYe5p5WpSCFQY9u5hbKyPqC3Hd/REGElronDl+AmZ5S0oPQ2JbUmzD RKcWVjKB9ZkiDhjvo4WuTBRHt0S7rwrl+N2kTpx2dJfRYNUKwIvF2hrjHvYH1sImbR4v4f zS9G7FMnY1qE3nmkzK+vh6PlbOxnBoNznqaPNQAldGCUi7k4OQ2Gsrd0GbbMWuV1FJjj4Y bo3HFeqrMoiWsoyxXe//v5lgIKNtLKUgfSDnylHkqVN0k0PN7EddTc3oRr3BER1bN8ln3D S7yNUhrVwm3TVH1JAhNKkgclEyVa+QEzxEFP1OmFYHbgU84c+FJhg2E3RPYrCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1735786382; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bIcjF9JS9jcRlHr3+75ONKB8b7vggYHS55SIPIGXcIqTLsSpVizUxrGDGAa004YtM4n/B6 Y+Ccf9r7sfA/Fc38YM7aCtTtBQD9IUQ6lz00AsWHk9PNqxISU/BlImPPEgOmrX4APEj5X+ JNSI+2JrwVeSqU706jzL6AHIxW2wZuLiIGiYpyVnTfms0LqVkhD2l1UsjYG3b9vQkKegqC TtGYSw5Scdqm3OEFQSUC1crRxzaXqhVcpHySn06pylXvR90epYyzbBLJZqrLMm+rOPlt5F zkKv9r2icPfUS+XE1sFOmq/TvXZssrHNM4U4Nbre6eczhjl1aBSIOXoPASXBBg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YNrqL3TzKzrWc for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 02:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5022r23O027623 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 02:53:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 5022r257027622 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 2 Jan 2025 02:53:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 165059] vtnet(4): Networking breaks with a router using virtio net driver on KVM host Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 02:52:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: john@jnielsen.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D165059 --- Comment #39 from John Nielsen --- (In reply to John Nielsen from comment #36) I was mistaken, my KVM-hosted router does suffer from this issue. So even m= ore happy to test patches than previously stated. What needs to happen in terms of fixing (or ignoring) the bad checksums for= the NAT case and where? In the firewall/NAT code? vtnet driver? Somewhere else? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=