From nobody Thu Oct 31 13:42:19 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XfQCb4m1hz5bjh4 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XfQCb0d2Qz4v9K for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1730382139; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hInCGFegIaAI3sXoJlYZfgoMgZaVBL/hDx5YBRgiqs8=; b=Izd1Gnnf+jNjljwkXQRRGJ4Ne1Gauk40GDhyf2bdJoY1pEsfC0qFC0ofavKI3oOzLv315o G7zzQZEYIAoUQg1Vy5g0+fyUSrMe/d0u4t2xeaL0JF8IKszrk2ZfT8Tu72QC/PN8va7B6S R8WoLGx/FYKHUmT0ym2Z2tfQiogRNvjEnrEGzlgOiWSUmmmfLkudPiUW3i+EzuNXsL2wE5 L31fodJ6x42uLGqGiACja+0X5NjwiebtKJ+ZVi/zlWk/v2PkdgoosjBKwgMxOEy3c4OHMn FQSdYY18az7Y6wl7nmPgNBXdzpgHHd/YeoNqXZdojv0eEqDhYmSgRnlkXE2nQA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1730382139; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GU+fu1//07sMCf4u6WeH1AXXrIEUhuTjLbSTddN8MgujUe1jbWPlKNqiBJFGfAse6Y0C9g TI8yF6hx0eygAlungnHl+9FI3wd8CJU2v5N4tIW5lt8NlCFlEqvOvxmjzorQ6fUBiKPQnZ IjTYTp14hnthXwkxeoaoygNHrMrtiSP5oFQx7XB6JAkCfBIvEF/VnwX06WLnNQ6NII3MTL 86gdS71gVmK7AzFLBa8v3VMMN/BTBfz7MrOanxIq8bDvYka9xQtiL3ypyRXTE/ZIsGG/jt XXJIokJzueix1zkneqB+TXWwvWA+P2HAm5FXrDIZDexLWlRizPaG+bFN7L7ang== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XfQCb0CVBzdNb for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49VDgIRp063382 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:42:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49VDgIxA063379 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:42:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282445] Wrong stack() info in dtrace Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:42:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: artemhevorhian@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282445 Artem Hevorhian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #2 from Artem Hevorhian --- Well, > I see that the instruction in each case is the instruction *after* the ca= ll instruction which leads to the next frame in the stack, which is an arti= fact of the way stack unwinding is handled. It explains everything. I see exactly the same behavior on my machine. This ticket could be closed now. Everything works as expected. >> Because the pure hash value seems to be okay. > What do you mean by this? After looking closely, I see that here the instruction points correctly at = jmp, which one instruction after the one being currently tracked. Correct. I think this ticket can be closed now. Thank you very much for the explanat= ion. Have a good day! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=