From nobody Fri Oct 18 15:37:30 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XVTNW2LQhz5ZMdY for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XVTNW03yKz4f5D for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1729265851; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AfsA8taC0rZIIQTbUiTWygwsZVl5mRFk60GoHaXGisM=; b=ghv2epVz9tHYbfU+SGsC7505HicQN6fTIjA+UYOIGvy1V96MMJuDwAc/pihz892n+kgd7B 8MBQ5oK4Q0QRPCtE7t3WUZ1X5kuJ6YQM/vGTUhWojzRCS3+X9R+2IZIBMN8YbwnEOCgbIY 0Krmqd6ZyQO0t6k+etfMHCD+oyhIeUNdWY+IbtQFnfuJDLLVIwrhV6A8BmkVK0GuveaUBx br1nowjOhnG2fSd8dcuHMjT/hZyWX+FUxQ+rdgZDmLQSYuhYsEEvpKMO7utU8+c6vwl+1u 7E0k5yfO8o8kMu29ENuep2Pa84PUY4aTEGHwOOelTAN+DwarVEybRjbU2dJltg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1729265851; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=N9Fjb6ma9BTgSg3yuCV6xrU1oUTffaa9QiNslJuzrDj8I/1rdYhYz1fvKUR+4uc198Cbke OXC9BWAFCw/+rNs4X6i8iTS45mOe1u/5xP0LnprcxKMzVeeymNZt+e1W1RFz55nKfNdwgy WTxUmL30Be3bbJqBz447lfthy/FYuY7MGAtdL1LhkLPjBMGHRyY/wrG06m8BIC50ZmI+kJ SyhreH7p4LQIbDVjOg5ZKZE35sqnROAYBOnO5BROBWr1K1IYesn4ij6aE7s8lyXVGdFWgw OhFmcXhsvHLA5Ou90oAkdhwVUa3M0lkWrLvIqM1GUbbXuFTmbQogmArn3Zt+tg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XVTNV6ZGbzfnM for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49IFbU6Y076724 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49IFbUIY076723 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282001] Inappropriate "BOOT LOADER IS TOO OLD" / missing initialization of bootprog_rev in lutils.c Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:37:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282001 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|In Progress |Closed --- Comment #11 from Mark Johnston --- With 13.5 coming soon, I'm ok with simply closing this. > so it seems like this is "jumping the line" in a big way I don't really agree - we (secteam) release ENs for issues which generate a= lot of bug reports, or if a bug is particularly severe somehow. It's mostly contingent on someone filling out the EN template and submitting it to sect= eam. We rarely reject ENs unless they truly seem trivial or the associated patc= h is too risky. In this case, there are some technical reasons for not releasing an EN, but= if not for that, based on past experience I think we would go ahead with it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=