From nobody Fri Oct 18 15:18:26 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XVSyW2TXXz5ZLX7 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XVSyW1JX0z4d6R for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1729264707; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hiAdJKInTj/tJxbAphsjO/2wJ1THck/RpEhUqBUavIc=; b=u/Xr0PudifdWkLx0bFh9IJNDPnvYEWIRqiqMfokOZ+ZMZp6C4qXskbD4IlDUnSFT4pRdRz UMPoW9Me3B3ZJmQQvLFxCyXeTURmp977U9Fcr3z/68ur9/Y9Ew10IBqmrWyVY5HzQUt7j/ lb7xqz1jmzaQTawVGB0QF47JjgHNTs5QH9TmpjMRPUxLYeoMGnSjFTZRAGTcSLwSPVLgTp NvzzGxGCin4VhQaz9jtn+L2/8y6SqGhHdUfXDk6QhPmdE7jUKgcWdpQ2LCK5lkT2yCnVJl wuAIdmQussDUhG/fY3wmhaDraMebT3t5lPgvoz8Ee8hZjMT8Wh7uVcMSkrBWVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1729264707; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=wUpa5vVi5gbFWyGNp3EIOmgexh6D7ElQ6OvrTUGctDb51llW3PhphPwpskhNgAcAlyCP3R vOidEyuUoMhIJ2HOdAEXaPk6+liW3cmFG6uI4v9YjrAQ2ubQigGbEdqiDSNhjWxGstiA2Z nDba3DTHpucD0jYN86QDbb/NszwzghHU9Y+eXo2FVWt4ajddIABW8F12pHu2sBZIlPoIV4 Tuu/RSpRn/iN+V4ClJq3nJahVvulv9q07f7RYYJVTj8Z4giAHKN6/Md/l67h0TwA0z9Hc6 0KBnJMzhamqCHXaRYYQmVAvftphm7Jwpl6nO4vm+ebWyzH4vpsgOE6PAY/V8Dw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XVSyW0tjKzdXb for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49IFIQFQ044625 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49IFIQ0k044623 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 282001] Inappropriate "BOOT LOADER IS TOO OLD" / missing initialization of bootprog_rev in lutils.c Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:18:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.4-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D282001 --- Comment #10 from Warner Losh --- (In reply to crahman from comment #9) > You could patch core.lua to remove the warning. That's a lot of work to remove a harmless warning that could be handled as = an errata. It's not relevant to stable/13, stable/14, nor main. A direct commit is easy, but then we have to write the EN, and do the administrative work to get it pushed out in a lot of places. All for removi= ng a warning that doesn't matter. That's the wrong approach. It's a lot of energy that the project should instead put towards making the actual updating of t= he ESP robust. There have been actual bugs, with actual hardware that cause pa= nics that haven't been ENs, so it seems like this is "jumping the line" in a big way. ENs should be simple and easy (and if they were I'd say go for it). But they aren't: they are difficult and have way too much overhead. Just my HO. We should just close this and move on. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=