From nobody Tue Oct 15 09:45:13 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XSTjP6RTJz5YgLx for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XSTjP0lJJz4LvS for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728985513; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/ySpWGzT39GZLpUd17cFVNUSFrnSLLn96GCmjWGw+qU=; b=Sdb2+JeqS0k9WZd0WdtLmG152wlSGicvumlsld4v61R9j74F057gLlQu/xDioc10tBHzfz bMZsCmrG6BiHwRgQXKbpKloR8+TFlk+vkJ4YRmhUYq11jLVMoCXkQWeqQ+R5Hbfvkkzud2 IoM2sBYhkvPeS20dzAY1p/2PjbNiriDIqnCSfStnFFzbGVXqAYBN7ar1oe4p3e01rB8BOV NvphbqCMT9D8wX5KksdumdkfyLqSSDrph6ckfhUlQ4tis8ezE7h6f1ER1j2rx7yptDcoaW IXqpifcvylkV5pxTSTaMtfmh/QhUvMPqog4ktc1Tw0s/ydOP+iIskidFUSos/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1728985513; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=geCVuczZt0MNwww5GPm5CeKeh3IAPMLhnQVsyuMcyaeK4apyhmTdkJz5QkDvCBc6TsZVsf OpSBdGDXwjV/6I/e8zDXNQ8VX4OVd7DGBrD3VqdRxLqKAcycv4b4hFfGhTNaitIjuQYTC2 r2xHut/fmVS/OuZ1tKs/gED6Y8vw5t9SKMBUPobV2JyJm4nCxiyZe/uBPnroiEv0jItcz4 OzmZnEyGqo5woQNnvy0JuY3tkhIlR7PxL2Rjoj6v1zTzQHuI6vdgLDCiFhAhAwDYT0Vm/o l9npKwDgC3m+P+HGnljMt0RRa6sCapkpsfAjl5G1PmdKBKbR+OdgnqN5b9Cxqw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XSTjP0653zHR7 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49F9jC9w091778 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:45:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49F9jCuV091777 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:45:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243177] open(2): Add O_CREATFIFO flag Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 09:45:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: Unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rfg-freebsd@tristatelogic.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243177 --- Comment #5 from Ronald F. Guilmette --- At this point, after waiting more than 4.75 years for anyone to even just l= ook at this PR, I'm not inclined to spend much time debating the merits of implementing something like the suggested O_CREATFIFO flag. I will just of= fer the (closing?) observation that the O_CREAT flag was created for a very good reason and that reason, it seems to me, must necessarily apply equally well= to both regular files AND fifos. I am not seeing a clear argument to the contrary. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=