From nobody Sat Oct 05 15:58:03 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XLVSD1QZbz5YVSk for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 15:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XLVSC65Lnz4GhW for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728143883; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Df0EJ5tVOAvrZjxdSkhfrxDQInlcTOPMlXVA4ZYWoKY=; b=VfXSVGkXMw0hMTkZKS2vDJUJSUXlX4xue9NBG38sQo17VeCpJoBUJh0kbubkPJnhWmohz+ tvbnJyv93f1Ou7RLASVo6jZtVshVQWY5OkGEvfFByT34dp60CnEEgvylZIF1oc2469w8Bk MNabkHrXv16jtsxbReLX0RxqbCzUrDzJMwG5abjdo78J5rEUs8ifccEUS6V/vjxZaUpv0y if5VujAKHl1QVDkP0dFKG1EJJbNZv6MATgSbaODvWcKENXbU8yEIvotzYJaEBxPqu/Ky5h 2o+aZxM3xdRWDuii2d7zpQB3TVZ3SCP2TWLHfJROKaBPuw3kq/lg8U1+H/gRWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1728143883; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=l2oqQS+6smqaoOBuBxNXSxvO1dfotXUdwln2zbN+c7AaREJNggYh43srrJggatIHbC5gam 0rx6znMzeW4TcxDF0p8b67isitniYp+TCoC4NQ+BX0JEeq8LCtd+OrMz2ax+Qb/yHzcFnR WNgUW5eVcjI3p9lbCnMw0bxJh4UrgFcXVYIoHU+pgNcJqqFqnBEUEi1LYjbOQmisUY9KNV XrUOYy3NbJFB3pFWJxqN7tmJW/5bEI62lUQZ0woW6H1StoY6+i3uC/E4P0Ov3y3PeiRBpw sNMfqB9AUXGnk3rAfCigwi3hb+ywsVof5DFZKh9Qk4CDf1/Olk0WZZXtKPkYVA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XLVSC5Zc7zPVn for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 495Fw3s6071573 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:58:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 495Fw34x071572 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:58:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280846] Low memory freezes / OOM: a thread waited too long to allocate a page Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 15:58:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280846 --- Comment #30 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #29) Ah, sorry, I thought I had verified that the patch applies cleanly, but I m= ight have reordered them after that check. Indeed, I have another patch which a= dds some uses of atomic_load_int(), but I don't believe they are necessary for testing the patch, so I didn't include them. The patch against 14.1 that Henrich posted looks ok to me in any case. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=