[Bug 267028] kernel panics when booting with both (zfs,ko or vboxnetflt,ko or acpi_wmi.ko) and amdgpu.ko
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:02:31 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=267028 --- Comment #193 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to George Mitchell from comment #192) Viewed at actual size or zoomed in on an iPad I was able to read some of the text in: https://www.m5p.com/public/george/267028/IMG_20241210_093239744_HDR.jpg . . . vgapci0: child drmn0 requested pci_get_powerstate sysctl_warn_reuse: can't re-use a leaf (hw.dri.debug)! <6>[drm] Initialized amdgpu 3.40.0 20150101 for drmn0 on minor 0 It panicked here instead of getting to the point of showing what would normally be next: "Autoloading module: acpi_wmi" However, the <6> is also not normal and may well be sigificant. The panic was something like: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1: apic id = 01 instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff00cf0110 . . . current process = 25 (kldload) trap number = 9 (I doubt that I could tell c vs. e or 0 vs. 8 .) In the presence of the panic context I do not expect the drm_modeset locking is able to operate correctly. In other words: I expect that the !drm_modeset_is_locked notices are expected, given the Fatal trap 9 and its being handling in the kernel. That in turn messes things up even more for later --or so I guess. I expect that the later trap 22 (in the other picture) is from the lack of handling during the attempt to present the trap 9 information. The other picture's backtrace suggests for the instruction pointer reported above (general range of upper address bits): instruction pointer = 0x2?:0xffffffff80?f?11? where the "?"'s are about the 0 vs. 8 and c vs. e question. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.