[Bug 281013] ypldap.conf does not permit an alternate port number for the LDAP server
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 17:48:52 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281013 Bug ID: 281013 Summary: ypldap.conf does not permit an alternate port number for the LDAP server Product: Base System Version: 14.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: bin Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: gray@nxg.name Created attachment 253041 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=253041&action=edit Patch to /usr/src/usr.sbin/ypldap, against git commit deb948cd8dc2efb341ce96e1b7a56c9fbc662ba1 In ypldap.conf, the LDAP server is specified by a line directory "some.host" { # directives } This does not allow one to specify an LDAP server running on a different port (for example a test server). Also, ypldap will produce BSD-style passwd lines which (see passwd(5)) includes class, change and expire fields, which some clients (eg Linux clients) don't expect. I attach a patch which addresses both: * It adds an optional 'port <NNN>' to this LDAP server specification. * It adds a clause 'attribute <attname> omit' to omit certain attributes from the constructed responses. Notes: * The original grammar in parse.y includes an optional 'port "<NNN>"' specification, giving the port number within a string, but neither implementing nor documenting this. I've implemented this as above, but switched to a number rather than a string. * The current OpenBSD ypldap.conf [1] includes a similar optional port specification, as well as a 'tls' flag. * The current OpenBSD implementation seems to be ahead of the FreeBSD one. This patch works for me in testing, but I have *not* deployed it to production, since in the course of testing, I encountered the behaviour I have logged as bug #281012. My motivation for this was to ease the transition of some machines from NIS to LDAP, by using ypldap as an intermediate step. I'm probably now going to find a Plan B; I therefore don't expect to be developing this further, but for what it's worth, I offer it here. [1] https://man.openbsd.org/ypldap.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.