[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma (for RPi* contexts)"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma (for RPi* contexts)"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma (for RPi* contexts)"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma (for RPi* contexts)"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma (for RPi* contexts)"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 268835] Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma (for RPi* contexts)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 23:54:57 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268835 Bug ID: 268835 Summary: Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: arm64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com CC: manu@freebsd.org Created attachment 239352 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=239352&action=edit main [so: 14]: Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma Use BUS_PASS_INTERRUPT+BUS_PASS_ORDER_LATE for bcm_dma for both main [so: 14] and stable/13 . I'll also be adding an attachment for the stable/13 case since stable/13 and main do not match in the very few lines involved. This avoids crashes for booting with newer RPi* firmware than is in sysutils/rpi-firmware . But this is not a proposal for updating sysutils/rpi-firmware at all. I've my own interest in testing something with newer firmware. I've also seen reports about *.dtb files that do not exist in sysutils/rpi-firmware . At some point someone might put in the work to add support for such RPi* devices. If anyone does, they likely would like to avoid the stage if dealing with the boot-crash that now happens. My test context had: "C0T" 8 GiByte Rev1.5 RPi4B "B0T" 8 GiByte Rev1.4 and 4 GiByte Rev1.1 RPI4Bs RPi3B RPi2B v1.2 RPi2B v1.1 (so: armv7) and some non-RPi*'s: ThreadRipper 1950X (so an amd64) HoneyComb MACCHIATObin Double Shot Rock64 OrangePi+2ed (so: armv7) For aarch64 and armv7, I test the same boot media both on RPi*'s and at least one non-RPi* My testing spanned main and stable/13 examples. I've tried multiple tagged RPI* firmware releases and none lead to a crash with the change in place. The non-RPI*'s continued to work normally. For reference, all the boot media are now at (picking an example system): # uname -apKU # Long output line split for readability FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #75 main-n259950-5723e5ac6d76-dirty: Fri Jan 6 01:50:53 PST 2023 root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400077 1400077 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.