[Bug 275436] tmpfs does not honor memory limits on writes
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 275436] tmpfs does not honor memory limits on writes"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 08:04:51 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275436 --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- VM (alomst) always ensures that there are several free pages. More, it even typically manages to free several pages in reasonable time. This is why our OOM organized in current way: - global OOM triggers when VM cannot get a free page despite existence of the page shortage, in all domains, for some time. It is typically triggered when kernel allocates too much unmanaged pages (not tmpfs case). - per-process OOM triggers when page fault handler needs a page and cannot allocate it after several cycles of allocation attempts. I added the second (per-process) OOM since global OOM (similar to your patch) was not able to handle typical situation with usermode sitting on too many dirty pages. Now that I formulated this, I think that for tmpfs a reasonable approach would be something in line of per-process OOM: try the allocation, and return ENOSPC if it failed, with some criteria for restart. You might look at vm/vm_fault.c vm_fault_allocate_oom(). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.