[Bug 260871] [patch] /usr/bin/touch enhancement
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 260871] [patch] touch(1) enhancement"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 260871] [patch] touch(1) enhancement"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 260871] [patch] touch(1) enhancement"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 260871] [patch] touch(1) enhancement"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 02:15:40 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260871 Bug ID: 260871 Summary: [patch] /usr/bin/touch enhancement Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: bin Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jamie@catflap.org Created attachment 230614 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=230614&action=edit patch to add "-R" to touch(1) I'm not quite sure how you deal with "non-standard" additions to standard commands, so please be gentle! Incidentally, I have no preference for actual implementation, this is just what I've been using for a while. Comments welcome! Basically, touch(1) has: -h If the file is a symbolic link, change the times of the link itself rather than the file that the link points to. and: -r Use the access and modifications times from the specified file instead of the current time of day. If "-r" points to a link, the link is always followed to retrieve the datetime information. I have a program that needs to "-r" the datetime of the link itself if the file is a link. Up to now, I've been doing a stat of the file, and then forming the date to add, but recently thought to add this option: -R As -r , but if the file is a symbolic link, return the times of the link itself rather than the file that the link points to. Patch attached. Comments? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.