From nobody Sat Jan 01 23:26:56 2022 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE06193B9CF for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JRJ7N2Tr0z3QYn for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B71276BE for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 201NQumn075502 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:26:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 201NQuml075501 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 Jan 2022 23:26:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214254] Freebsd-update does not request a reboot in all cases where it is needed Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2022 23:26:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bc979@lafn.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1641079616; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tY2cWHeGm+7YZnVLasAG3ZoOn5nhiKygHLpbE+IR4ow=; b=Hms7MysK4eq+9XD4nQ7PWIgIxEosaTP/VvAfo1B1QyBz/hilN5iwVwArTxRe1hNZigQd5d ZJgU5O2gjtUuk+x8CkC86TTulxfZgr5Po/lDLAEE2BbXr7NESb8NkfXGorN0MDen6X4C9N VZwU/HfqmVQBkM6CmbBdUI8+txTrFFOAzoeZLSAyL5qNptxYL7k6ijHqHTFJQllonnlTrY Updi1bdhQNQfXbuWm1L/UkDLMSw/B7xV5iGneHvcqhWlfSjXfVClzJYiLjb9jzoSdRxj8N Or1MyvPGNVPqqtRM+C6aEe4larw7CT5cN/zbDQYGfMVIfEcwXGUvOsZBbMmV4g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1641079616; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eR9iRmbjIyEOa6o62HxCfq8hULlvPcuQCij6WV/IyctHwI3WyaWL6rE7Eeh+YYnl5ys7l0 8UqIBFROoSMEOEyoIevZ1OQIxaTZ70T4qOWpxs/jgwsvhJ7JWdbZ5Y8cjQxKzwTfZ3crtB aYZiOSAkEzwFztO7MHu4qRR213OAlf6MkxdQhGfa/KPYUkbmBwVWIFObFMjUTSbRIdL5xf XAFgyMt4lwA2m4EGk7tdX3tgpSeJhJWvL9Q+9QJUQb7InT31LVqJ3PhZ3MmuIa8T+qryd+ rG3iF/XbeMEYQ3LRn2cZivjo9cDUItL5Qd61olEzhWLEb91FJHa5cNOKzudLhw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214254 --- Comment #2 from bc979@lafn.org --- The reboot recommendation/requirement issue continues on to the latest versions. The current approach appears to be that a reboot is recommended somewhere in the documentations and then leave it up to the administrator to determine if there is anything running that needs to be restarted. It would seem to me that it would be better to require the reboot and then = show the kinds of processes that would not get updated if a reboot was not performed. The best approach would be for the system to examine itself and determine w= hich running processes require a reboot and make the recommendation based on tha= t.=20 I suspect that would be much more difficult to implement though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=