[Bug 258623] [routing] peformance - 2 numa domains vs signale numa domain
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 258623] cxgbe(4): Slow routing performance: 2 numa domains vs single numa domain"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:24:43 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=258623
Bug ID: 258623
Summary: [routing] peformance - 2 numa domains vs signale numa
domain
Product: Base System
Version: 13.0-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: kern
Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: konrad.kreciwilk@korbank.pl
CC: net@FreeBSD.org
Server: Dell R630, 2x CPU E5-2667 v4 - 2 numa domains, 64GB Ram
NIC: 2x T62100-SO-CR - each connected to a separate numa domain
* 2 numa domain test
I use chelsio_affinity to assign irq to correct CPU
cfg:
ifconfig_cc0="up"
ifconfig_cc1="up"
ifconfig_cc2="up"
ifconfig_cc3="up"
#LAGG LACP
ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto lacp laggport cc0 laggport cc2 -wol -vlanhwtso -tso
-lro -hwrxtstmp -txtls use_flowid use_numa up"
ifconfig_vlan2020="vlan 2020 vlandev lagg0"
ifconfig_vlan2002="vlan 2002 vlandev lagg0"
+--------+ +--------+ +---------+
| +---------+ +------+ |
| Router | lagg0 | switch | | gen |
| +---------+ +------+ |
+--------+ +--------+ +---------+
I can achieve around 14Mpps without drop. Above this level, drops appear on the
ccX/lagg0 interfaces. It looks like a CPU some free resources:
# netstat -i -I lagg0 1
input lagg0 output
packets errs idrops bytes packets errs bytes colls
15939431 0 555822 2246265134 15381955 0 2167675870 0
16600413 0 612946 2339414686 15978803 0 2253137798 0
15259699 0 575481 2150765886 14693013 0 2070319352 0
15935269 0 512558 2245569909 15382551 0 2167518240 0
16159627 0 616404 2277463695 15563046 0 2195364136 0
14841125 0 322695 1605926868 14540305 0 1562096456 0
# top -PSH
last pid: 9745; load averages: 6.46, 2.02, 0.76
up 0+00:02:06 20:25:17
580 threads: 25 running, 471 sleeping, 84 waiting
CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 59.2% interrupt, 40.8% idle
CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 57.7% interrupt, 42.3% idle
CPU 2: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 57.7% interrupt, 42.3% idle
CPU 3: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 60.6% interrupt, 39.4% idle
CPU 4: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 56.3% interrupt, 43.7% idle
CPU 5: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 62.0% interrupt, 38.0% idle
CPU 6: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 59.2% interrupt, 40.8% idle
CPU 7: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 53.5% interrupt, 46.5% idle
CPU 8: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 1.4% system, 62.0% interrupt, 36.6% idle
CPU 9: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 67.6% interrupt, 32.4% idle
CPU 10: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 69.0% interrupt, 31.0% idle
CPU 11: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 66.2% interrupt, 33.8% idle
CPU 12: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 63.4% interrupt, 36.6% idle
CPU 13: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 62.0% interrupt, 38.0% idle
CPU 14: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 63.4% interrupt, 36.6% idle
CPU 15: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 63.4% interrupt, 36.6% idle
Mem: 536M Active, 29M Inact, 1528M Wired, 60G Free
ARC: 114M Total, 22M MFU, 88M MRU, 693K Header, 3231K Other
30M Compressed, 92M Uncompressed, 3.12:1 Ratio
Swap: 32G Total, 32G Free
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU8 8 0:37 60.50% intr{irq152:
t6nex1:0a0}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU10 10 0:36 60.42% intr{irq154:
t6nex1:0a2}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU11 11 0:36 60.27% intr{irq155:
t6nex1:0a3}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU14 14 0:36 60.26% intr{irq158:
t6nex1:0a6}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU12 12 0:36 60.24% intr{irq156:
t6nex1:0a4}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU9 9 0:36 60.15% intr{irq153:
t6nex1:0a1}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU13 13 0:36 59.88% intr{irq157:
t6nex1:0a5}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU15 15 0:36 59.41% intr{irq159:
t6nex1:0a7}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 0 0:37 58.49% intr{irq98:
t6nex0:0a0}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 1 0:37 57.89% intr{irq99:
t6nex0:0a1}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 4 0:37 57.39% intr{irq102:
t6nex0:0a4}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 5 0:36 57.35% intr{irq103:
t6nex0:0a5}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 3 0:36 57.32% intr{irq101:
t6nex0:0a3}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 6 0:36 57.12% intr{irq104:
t6nex0:0a6}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 2 0:36 56.98% intr{irq100:
t6nex0:0a2}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K WAIT 7 0:36 56.85% intr{irq105:
t6nex0:0a7}
# pcm-numa.x
Time elapsed: 1064 ms
Core | IPC | Instructions | Cycles | Local DRAM accesses | Remote DRAM
Accesses
0 1.31 4195 M 3203 M 3382 K 48 K
1 1.32 4211 M 3199 M 3241 K 27 K
2 1.33 4238 M 3196 M 3146 K 48 K
3 1.33 4238 M 3197 M 3143 K 26 K
4 1.32 4228 M 3197 M 3241 K 47 K
5 1.33 4243 M 3198 M 3046 K 29 K
6 1.33 4247 M 3195 M 3169 K 47 K
7 1.33 4264 M 3196 M 3180 K 20 K
8 1.29 4159 M 3224 M 2948 K 77 K
9 1.29 4172 M 3224 M 2865 K 92 K
10 1.29 4199 M 3247 M 3263 K 76 K
11 1.30 4237 M 3259 M 2892 K 91 K
12 1.30 4261 M 3274 M 3069 K 73 K
13 1.30 4231 M 3246 M 2959 K 104 K
14 1.30 4291 M 3291 M 3353 K 74 K
15 1.31 4221 M 3227 M 3008 K 85 K
pmcstat-S cpu_clk_unhalted.thread flamegraph - https://files.fm/u/enhy23ffr
--------------------
* single domain test
In this scenario I create vlans on single cc0 (use one numa domian)
ifconfig_vlan2020="vlan 2020 vlandev cc0"
ifconfig_vlan2002="vlan 2002 vlandev cc0"
+--------+ +--------+ +---------+
| +---------+ +------+ |
| Router | cc0 | switch | | gen |
| | | +------+ |
+--------+ +--------+ +---------+
Using cc0 I can achieve 16Mpps without drops:
# netstat -i -I cc0 1
input cc0 output
packets errs idrops bytes packets errs bytes colls
15934346 0 0 2245565269 15933728 0 2245477291 0
15927621 0 0 2244617740 15928235 0 2244704202 0
15934688 0 0 2245613662 15934213 0 2245546449 0
15931155 0 0 2245115588 15931208 0 2245120654 0
15926995 0 0 2244529583 15927391 0 2244585093 0
15931114 0 0 2245109534 15931145 0 2245115823 0
# top -PSH
last pid: 9976; load averages: 6.57, 2.51, 1.00
up 0+00:03:23 20:16:17
579 threads: 25 running, 470 sleeping, 84 waiting
CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 95.4% interrupt, 4.6% idle
CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 95.4% interrupt, 4.6% idle
CPU 2: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 94.7% interrupt, 5.3% idle
CPU 3: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 93.9% interrupt, 6.1% idle
CPU 4: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 94.7% interrupt, 5.3% idle
CPU 5: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 94.7% interrupt, 5.3% idle
CPU 6: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 94.7% interrupt, 5.3% idle
CPU 7: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 93.1% interrupt, 6.9% idle
CPU 8: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 9: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 10: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 11: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 12: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 13: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 14: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
CPU 15: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
Mem: 537M Active, 30M Inact, 1260M Wired, 60G Free
ARC: 115M Total, 22M MFU, 89M MRU, 695K Header, 3260K Other
30M Compressed, 93M Uncompressed, 3.10:1 Ratio
Swap: 32G Total, 32G Free
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU3 3 1:50 94.86% intr{irq101:
t6nex0:0a3}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU1 1 1:49 94.68% intr{irq99:
t6nex0:0a1}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU5 5 1:49 94.40% intr{irq103:
t6nex0:0a5}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU7 7 1:49 94.18% intr{irq105:
t6nex0:0a7}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU0 0 1:49 94.13% intr{irq98:
t6nex0:0a0}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU6 6 1:49 94.11% intr{irq104:
t6nex0:0a6}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU4 4 1:49 93.81% intr{irq102:
t6nex0:0a4}
12 root -92 - 0B 1472K CPU2 2 1:48 93.56% intr{irq100:
t6nex0:0a2}
# pcm-numa.x
Time elapsed: 1002 ms
Core | IPC | Instructions | Cycles | Local DRAM accesses | Remote DRAM
Accesses
0 1.93 6513 M 3374 M 4179 K 34 K
1 1.93 6516 M 3374 M 4153 K 3655
2 1.94 6518 M 3352 M 4122 K 33 K
3 1.94 6516 M 3367 M 4118 K 8574
4 1.94 6517 M 3361 M 4142 K 37 K
5 1.93 6516 M 3376 M 4147 K 10 K
6 1.93 6515 M 3371 M 4154 K 39 K
7 1.94 6514 M 3360 M 4173 K 12 K
8 0.24 1833 K 7596 K 1805 1378
9 0.20 728 K 3726 K 467 502
10 0.11 312 K 2779 K 227 234
11 0.14 486 K 3407 K 291 361
12 0.12 357 K 2956 K 183 132
13 0.07 195 K 2664 K 46 119
14 0.13 381 K 3047 K 455 212
15 0.23 765 K 3310 K 325 346
---------------------------------------------------------------------
pmcstat-S cpu_clk_unhalted.thread flamegraph - https://files.fm/u/3njfz2r3g
* Summary
I know, lagg makes a certain amount of overhead but based on my testing a
single card performs better than two cards in lagg0 .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.