Re: Radxa Orion O6
- Reply: FUKAUMI Naoki : "Re: Radxa Orion O6"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: Radxa Orion O6"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:56:21 UTC
[WARNING: My notes turn out to seem to be significantly based on a misinterpretation of one of the pictures.] On Jan 21, 2025, at 08:56, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello FUKAUMI, > > On Jan 21, 2025, at 04:27, FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com> wrote: > >> On 1/21/25 08:38, Mark Millard wrote: >>>>> A verbose boot output would likely be handy for someone that >>>>> knows what they are doing for ACPI contexts. >>>> >>>> Changing FreeBSD boot options causes a kernel panic on the serial console as shown below ("DeviceTree" mode): >>> The early part of the ACPI boot likely gives relevant >>> information for ACPI, even if there is a later >>> panic/boot-failure. This presumes being able to capture >>> and report the output that does occur, however. >> >> I captured kernel messages (acpi & verbose) as much as possible. >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ck-T2S6oln5y0XiJcp7rKtUl3xEiaWQG/view?usp=sharing >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NrZCdBiaVDsNjw1gbNvt5qDMpG0YDrC_/view?usp=sharing >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pt3JqOGD8mYU76ld0l7cD3_sljAnBCi8/view?usp=sharing >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uCMljSjxDDpfPFatJ3ji0gyFhD4Bi844/view?usp=sharing > > Warning that I'm not an expert in the area. > > The one just above shows a ConventionalMemory region starting at Physical > 000085000000 with #Pages 0001b000 . So: 000085000000 up to 0000A0000000 > (not included). > > But its later "Physical memory chunk(s)" list does not include such a > range. Nor does "Excluded memory regions" list anything in that range. WARNING: I seem to have misinterpreted the picture: it looks like the "missing" Physical memory chunk(s) line is because of the screen being mid-update when the picture was taken, not that it was actually missing: Other of the EMails show the "missing" Physical memory chunk(s) lines. > I'll also note that there is a "Reserved" starting at 0000A0000000 for > 00008000 pages . So: 0000A0000000 up to 0000A8000000 (not included), > which is immediately after the above. > > Also: That Reseserved is, in turn immediately following by more > ConventionalMemory, so there is a hole in the middle, in a sense. > This end: 0000A8000000 up to 0000FFFC0000 (not included). > > There is also at the end a Reserved starting at 000084800000 with > 00000800 pages. So: 000084800000 up to 000085000000 (not included) > > That means the sequence is really: > > Reserved 000084800000 up to 000085000000 (not included) > ConventionalMemory 000085000000 up to 0000A0000000 (not included) > Reserved 0000A0000000 up to 0000A8000000 (not included) > ConventionalMemory 0000A8000000 up to 0000FFFC0000 (not included) > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ynr6-bfWg0zs6sbe76QE6XsPstgegbEu/view?usp=sharing > > The one above reports: > > ram0: reserving memory region: 85000000-a0000000 > > which then gets the panic. (After all: not > listed in Physical memory chunk(s).) > > SIDE NOTE: > It is unfortunate that the output conventions > vary for upper bounds. In Physical memory chunk(s) > and Excluded memory regions, that would have been > listed more like: > > 0x85000000 - 0x9FFFFFFF > > instead of: > > 85000000-a0000000 > END SIDE NOTE > > It leads me to wonder if an off by one error might have > lead to the omission of 000085000000 up to 0000A0000000 > from Physical memory chunk(s)being treated as overlapping > with one of the Reserved regions that are next to it. > > Or may be some code that tries to potentially put the 2 > ConventionalMemory regions together but rejects the > attempt because of the Reserved in the middle and handles > the rejection by not adding 000085000000 up to 0000A0000000 > at all. > > I've not looked at the code. > > But it looks like the reason for Physical memory chunk(s) > excluding 0x85000000 - 0x9FFFFFFF needs to be discovered > and fixed. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com