From nobody Tue Feb 11 23:00:20 2025
X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Ysxjz3CTSz5mvR2;
	Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:00:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fuz@fuz.su)
Received: from fuz.su (fuz.su [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:e508::1])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
	 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
	(Client CN "fuz.su", Issuer "fuz.su" (not verified))
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ysxjy6McQz4Cnt;
	Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:00:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fuz@fuz.su)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from fuz.su (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fuz.su (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 51BN0LoZ007109
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:21 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from fuz@fuz.su)
Received: (from fuz@localhost)
	by fuz.su (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51BN0L7V007108;
	Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:21 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from fuz)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:20 +0100
From: Robert Clausecker <fuz@fuz.su>
To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>,
        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: 141releng-armv7-quarterly stuck in run-depends status for
 octave-forge-20241116: 34:28:33 for package build so far
Message-ID: <Z6vWhI3t80fHY6q1@fuz.su>
References: <0601C3C9-FABC-482C-A42B-0C707769D065.ref@yahoo.com>
 <0601C3C9-FABC-482C-A42B-0C707769D065@yahoo.com>
 <Z6syiwixIGol_8I9@fuz.su>
 <0792121A-3B7D-465F-A2BB-D2A095DF5A7A@yahoo.com>
 <Z6u9hchxHVE4GwGu@fuz.su>
 <7E7100A8-FDC1-4636-8F06-3C7DC8A9AF50@yahoo.com>
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-arm+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-arm+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7E7100A8-FDC1-4636-8F06-3C7DC8A9AF50@yahoo.com>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Ysxjy6McQz4Cnt
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:2001:41d0::/32, country:FR]

Hi Mark,

Am Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:15:38PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
> >> Should the package be considered broken for armv7 until
> >> it is fixed to build in a normal time frame instead of
> >> an O(nē) tiem frame, just because it takes too long as
> >> stands?
> > 
> > Yes, please mark it as broken.  It's only a metaport, so no
> > functionality is lost by not providing it.
> > The underlying problem should be fixed.
> 
> I'm not a committer --or even a maintainer of anything.
> So I can not be the one to make the actual "mark it as
> broken" commit. Are you looking for a bugzilla submittal
> with a patch to add something like:
> 
> BROKEN_armv7=	armv7 builds are spending, e.g., 39:49:02 in an N-squared-process.
> 
> before the USES= line in the Makefile?

I have pushed a commit to this effect:

https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=4cd4fdcc05c390cbdf29bfed57e7ba000f7fd721

Yours,
Robert Clausecker

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - for an encoding-agnostic world
/\  - against html email  - against proprietary attachments