From nobody Sat May 04 18:41:41 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VWxNH74fmz5JMYk; Sat, 4 May 2024 18:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=r5VE=MH=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Received: from smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl (smtp-relay-int.realworks.nl [194.109.157.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VWxNG6pBdz427C; Sat, 4 May 2024 18:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=r5VE=MH=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=klop.ws header.s=rw2 header.b="wECZN/HZ"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=klop.ws; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of "SRS0=r5VE=MH=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" designates 194.109.157.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=r5VE=MH=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl" Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 20:41:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klop.ws; s=rw2; t=1714848101; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=AC7144fU0rp2oQKF2N31xrhuvtusWNsuZpq4FKwn6Yk=; b=wECZN/HZvTcoIYI4ULRXjolpjsU+IcBQqnX2a++T3FadtDTPl1QZU+aPCsn0Ju3HXnQ16/ J5yz1IX1xg4eGVmJNvrigsb5Ndrf2m3ifVc99OfPJiPOW9pNwSyF7pmLFSCAQdra+sE6qS 8IHhr62bap6RpukSm3GD5JnFew7diz8DCl24VAyBwCI6OwCOmJvZQfzIX40s/k8o48lyaV 6+ViV/E2OdkNjJyO4rljTbjxljg3gDd2mWfyd2L0MyMo3uriHaUZ7vab8//sEMbupW+Ovz PdCpWcnaLWHSd0xx3GPWxN+iuoLXy+jufHsGzh3Vscl9n8fvmR0Y4XAjVno7+A== From: Ronald Klop To: Dmitry Salychev Cc: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <295333309.18213.1714848101402@localhost> In-Reply-To: <86y18rmc64.fsf@peasant.tower.home> Subject: Re: HoneyComb LX2 as a desktop List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_18212_347709332.1714848101398" X-Mailer: Realworks (701.18) Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.20 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[klop.ws,quarantine]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=r5VE=MH=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:194.109.157.0/24]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[klop.ws:s=rw2]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3265, ipnet:194.109.0.0/16, country:NL]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org,freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org,freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ronald-lists@klop.ws,SRS0=r5VE=MH=klop.ws=ronald-lists@realworks.nl]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[klop.ws:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VWxNG6pBdz427C ------=_Part_18212_347709332.1714848101398 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Would freebsd current with drm-61-kmod work better? Regards, Ronald Van: Dmitry Salychev Datum: 3 mei 2024 12:18 Aan: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Onderwerp: HoneyComb LX2 as a desktop > > > > Hi, > > I spent several days experimenting with my HoneyComb and two GPUs > (GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon R9 270X) left from the previously built > desktops. Results have been mostly disappointing so far. Take a look: > > - both GPUs are discoverable on the PCI bus; > - graphics/drm-510-kmod + graphics/gpu-firmware-amd-kmod (pitcairn > flavor) allow me to load firmware and attach drmn0; > - neither graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod nor x11/nvidia-driver cannot be used > on aarch64, it seems; > - xorg + kde5 start, but have some really annoying graphics glitches; > - xorg + xfce4 start as well, but graphics glitches make it impossible > to use at all. > > Does anyone use HoneyComb as a desktop? If so, which GPU/driver? > > Regards, > Dmitry > > -- > https://wiki.freebsd.org/DmitrySalychev > > > > > ------=_Part_18212_347709332.1714848101398 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Would freebsd current with drm-61-kmod work better?

Regards,
Ronald

Van: Dmitry Salychev <dsl@FreeBSD.org>
Datum: 3 mei 2024 12:18
Aan: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org
CC: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: HoneyComb LX2 as a desktop


Hi,

I spent several days experimenting with my HoneyComb and two GPUs
(GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon R9 270X) left from the previously built
desktops. Results have been mostly disappointing so far. Take a look:

- both GPUs are discoverable on the PCI bus;
- graphics/drm-510-kmod + graphics/gpu-firmware-amd-kmod (pitcairn
  flavor) allow me to load firmware and attach drmn0;
- neither graphics/nvidia-drm-kmod nor x11/nvidia-driver cannot be used
  on aarch64, it seems;
- xorg + kde5 start, but have some really annoying graphics glitches;
- xorg + xfce4 start as well, but graphics glitches make it impossible
  to use at all.

Does anyone use HoneyComb as a desktop? If so, which GPU/driver?

Regards,
Dmitry

--
https://wiki.freebsd.org/DmitrySalychev




------=_Part_18212_347709332.1714848101398--