Re: Git clone failures on armv7, was Re: Git core dump checking out main on armv7
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: Git clone failures on armv7, was Re: Git core dump checking out main on armv7 [independent armv7 replication, not on RPi2B]"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: Git clone failures on armv7, was Re: Git core dump checking out main on armv7"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 01:32:15 UTC
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024, 7:25 PM Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 26, 2024, at 17:42, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:51:59PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On Jun 25, 2024, at 17:28, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 10:17:53AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>>> On Jun 23, 2024, at 07:28, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It should be possible to mount the media normally used > >>>>>> on one of the RPi2B v1.1's on, say, an RPi4B. One could > >>>>>> then set up enough context to, say, chroot into the > >>>>>> armv7 file system and try executing the clone in that > >>>>>> context. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> That's physically not hard to do. Just power down the stable/14 > >>>>> Pi2 and plug the Pi2's boot disk into the Pi4. > >>>> > >>>> Up to power issues, if bus powered. > >>>> > >>>>>> The result would be using the RPi4B aarch64 kernel and > >>>>>> the armv7 world. If that has no problems, then the armv7 > >>>>>> kernel likely has problems that contribute but the armv7 > >>>>>> world would be less likely to. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Doing this can get into first using the likes of > >>>>>> (notation presumes use of /mnt at the mount point used > >>>>>> above): > >>>>>> > >>>>>> # mount -tdevfs devfs /mnt/dev/ > >>>>>> and possibly: > >>>>>> # mount -tfdescfs none /mnt/fd/ > >>>> > >>>> That last should have been: > >>>> > >>>> # mount -tfdescfs none /mnt/dev/fd/ > >>>> > >>>> Use of the likes of "mkdir -p . . ." may be required in > >>>> order to have the directories for use as mount points > >>>> if they are missing. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> before doing the likes of: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> # chroot /mnt/ > >>>>>> # # EXPERIMENT HERE > >>>>>> # exit > >>>>>> > >>>>> I didn't realise that armv7 binaries would run under > >>>>> an aarch64 kernel. Most convenient! > >>>> > >>>> Such can be used to have a faster way to build armv7 > >>>> packages, that also allows larger armv7 processes to > >>>> be involved (but still 32-bit limited with part of > >>>> the address space reserved, for sure). Not only that, > >>>> the process size limit is not a system > >>>> size limit: An RPi4B with 8 GiBytes of RAM can have > >>>> several armv7 processes at once that total over 4 > >>>> GiBytes of RAM in use at the time, no swapping > >>>> needing to be involved. > >>>> > >>>>>> Also, after exiting the chroot session, one would > >>>>>> do the likes of: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> # umount /mnt/dev/ > >>>>>> and possibly: > >>>>>> # umount /mnt/fd/ > >>>> > >>>> That should have been (order dependent for fd inside dev): > >>>> > >>>> possibly: > >>>> # umount /mnt/dev/fd/ > >>>> > >>>> then: > >>>> > >>>> # umount /mnt/dev/ > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> # umount /mnt/ > >>>>>> > >>>>> Thank you for the cleanup details! > >>>> > >>> > >>> I ended up trying the experiment twice. The first try used the mistaken > >>> mount -tfdescfs none /mnt/fd/ but since it was noted "possibly" I > ignored > >>> the error and the git clone command completed successfully. After > noticing > >>> your correction, the experiment was repeated and the clone failed: > >>> > >>> root@nemesis:/usr/2ndgittest # git clone --depth=1 -o freebsd ssh:// > anongit@192.158.248.9/src.git . > >>> Cloning into '.'... > >>> remote: Enumerating objects: 104636, done. > >>> remote: Counting objects: 100% (104636/104636), done. > >>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (88903/88903), done. > >>> client_loop: send disconnect: Broken pipe88.34 MiB | 165.00 KiB/s > >> > >> The above "client_loop: send disconnect: Broken pipe" > >> seems to be the original error here. > >> > >> It would be interesting to have evidence of how > >> repeatable such is and what variety of other > >> results happen. > > > > Using chroot on the aarch64 -current Pi4 I made > > repeated clones onto the mechanical hard disk > > hosting the armv7 stable/14 filesystem. Couldn't > > reproduce the error above in five tries. > > Transcript at > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/git_problems/readme_aarch64 > > Sounds like the armv7 kernel likely has some > issues of its own --instead of armv7 world. > Maybe it's just too big? Warner > Then I moved the disk to an armv7 -current Pi2 > > using the same chroot setup, the clone with > > --depth=1 worked so I dropped the depth limit > > and repeated; that caused a kernel panic. > > Does using the chroot setup using --depth=1 on the > RPi2B consistently work when tried repeatedly? Or > was this just an example of a rare success? > > > A second try without chroot resulted in failure but no panic: > > > <jemalloc>: Should own extent_mutex_pool(17) > > That looks like it would be interesting to someone > appropriately knowledgeable. If jemalloc can see bad > mutex ownerships, that seems like such could lead to > all sorts of later problems: Garbage-in/garbage-out. > > I do not know if the message means that various > corruptions might be in place afterwards so that > various later problems might be consequences that > are not surprising possibilities. > > > 47.25 MiB | 1.35 MiB/s > > error: index-pack died of signal 6 > > > > A repeat session produced an oft-seen failure: > > > > root@www:/mnt # mkdir 3rdarmv7gittest > > root@www:/mnt # cd 3rdarmv7gittest > > root@www:/mnt/3rdarmv7gittest # git clone -o freebsd ssh:// > anongit@192.158.248.9/src.git . > > Cloning into '.'... > > remote: Enumerating objects: 4511481, done. > > remote: Counting objects: 100% (383480/383480), done. > > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28955/28955), done. > > > <jemalloc>: Should own extent_mutex_pool(17) > > That is the same error notice as above that looked > to be interesting. > > Note that it happens before the later message > "error: index-pack died of signal 6". So that > last may just be a later consequence of the > earlier error(s). > > > 47.25 MiB | 1.35 MiB/s > > error: index-pack died of signal 6 > > fatal: index-pack failed > > root@www:/mnt/3rdarmv7gittest # ls > > root@www:/mnt/3rdarmv7gittest # cd .. > > root@www:/mnt # mkdir 4tharmv7gittest > > root@www:/mnt # cd 4tharmv7gittest > > root@www:/mnt/4tharmv7gittest # git clone -o freebsd ssh:// > anongit@192.158.248.9/src.git . > > Cloning into '.'... > > remote: Enumerating objects: 4511481, done. > > remote: Counting objects: 100% (383480/383480), done. > > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28955/28955), done. > > Receiving objects: 43% (1966916/4511481), 926.00 MiB | 626.00 KiB/s > > remote: Total 4511481 (delta 377747), reused 354525 (delta 354525), > pack-reused 4128001 (from 1) > > Receiving objects: 100% (4511481/4511481), 1.64 GiB | 705.00 KiB/s, done. > > fatal: pack is corrupted (SHA1 mismatch) > > fatal: index-pack failed > > Note the lack of a local message: > > <jemalloc>: Should own extent_mutex_pool > > But the prior jemalloc message(s) may be sufficient > context to not be surprised about this. > > > root@www:/mnt/4tharmv7gittest # > > > > No panic, however, and it seems reproducible: > > root@www:/mnt # mkdir 5tharmv7gittest > > root@www:/mnt # cd 5tharmv7gittest > > root@www:/mnt/5tharmv7gittest # git clone -o freebsd ssh:// > anongit@192.158.248.9/src.git . > > Cloning into '.'... > > remote: Enumerating objects: 4511513, done. > > remote: Counting objects: 100% (383480/383480), done. > > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28955/28955), done. > > remote: Total 4511513 (delta 377756), reused 354525 (delta 354525), > pack-reused 4128033 (from 1) > > Receiving objects: 100% (4511513/4511513), 1.64 GiB | 1.28 MiB/s, done. > > fatal: pack is corrupted (SHA1 mismatch) > > fatal: index-pack failed > > Note the lack of a local message: > > <jemalloc>: Should own extent_mutex_pool > > But the prior jemalloc message(s) may be sufficient > context to not be surprised about this (again). > > > root@www:/mnt/5tharmv7gittest > > > > Not sure what to try next, thanks for reading this far! > > > > bob prohaska > > > > > > Archived at > > http://www.zefox.net/~fbsd/rpi2/git_problems/readme_armv7 > > > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > > >