Re: A better alternative to having builds of main-armv7-default fully disabled and last-built be months out of date
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: A better alternative to having builds of main-armv7-default fully disabled and last-built be months out of date"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: A better alternative to having builds of main-armv7-default fully disabled and last-built be months out of date"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:20:55 UTC
Sorry for not following up to this thread earlier. I've been occupied elsewhere in the cluster. On 2024-07-07 16:25:32 (+0800), Mark Millard wrote: > On Jul 6, 2024, at 21:35, Michal Meloun <meloun.michal@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 07.07.2024 5:42, Mark Millard wrote: >>> main's armv7 packages that are distributed are getting to be months >>> behind because of the build hangups preventing the builds on >>> ampere2. It's worth reinforcing that this only affects main (15-CURRENT). Our stable/13 and stable/14 packages for armv7 are reasonably up to date. Reasonably for a tier-2 architecture anyway. Whatever is causing this, it's only in main. > The only known failures are on ampere2 as far as I know. > As far as I know there is no known way to configure to > match the formal build procedures used on ampere2. According to the current schedule, armv7 builds happen on ampere3, not ampere2: ampere1: - quarterly arm64.aarch64 13.3-RELEASE 133arm64 -a ampere1: - quarterly arm.armv7 releng/13.3 133releng-armv7 -a ampere1: - quarterly arm64.aarch64 14.0-RELEASE 140arm64 -a ampere1: - quarterly arm.armv7 releng/14.0 140releng-armv7 -a ampere2: - default arm64.aarch64 main main-arm64 -a ampere3: - default arm64.aarch64 13.3-RELEASE 133arm64 -a ampere3: - default arm.armv7 releng/13.3 133releng-armv7 -a ampere3: - default arm64.aarch64 14.0-RELEASE 140arm64 -a ampere3: - default arm.armv7 releng/14.0 140releng-armv7 -a I've attached the poudriere.conf from that machine. It's the same one we have on all the builders. >> I've seen some strange live lockups in arm32 jail, but never managed >> to reproduce it. > > On what kind(s) of hardware? > Any kind of relevant context known? In case it helps: ref15-aarch64.freebsd.org (available to all developers) is an identical configuration as ampereX.nyi.freebsd.org. The former has a newer BIOS (for some reason) but that hopefully should not make a difference. If we reach the point where we think the BIOS version matters, I can try to upgrade the BIOS on the ampereXen. smbios.bios.reldate="06/25/2020" smbios.bios.revision="1.14" smbios.bios.vendor="LENOVO" smbios.bios.version="hve104q-1.14" smbios.bios.reldate="05/30/2019" smbios.bios.revision="1.8" smbios.bios.vendor="LENOVO" smbios.bios.version="HVE104J-1.08" Philip