Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock

From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists_at_klop.ws>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 20:07:17 UTC
 
Van: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Datum: zondag, 7 juli 2024 19:18
Aan: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>
CC: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Onderwerp: Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock
> 
>  
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 11:16AM Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> wrote:
>> 
>> I created fakertc for my rpi4. 
>>  
>> https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/
>>  
>> Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot.
>>  
>> Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine.
> 
>  
> Curious why the root mod time isn't firing... it whould alrwady do that
>  
> Warner 
> __blockquote_end__
> 
> I'm using ZFS as root. AFAIK ZFS does not implement the usage of superblock unmount timestamp as time sync on boot like UFS. (or did you mean something else with "root mod time"?)
> 
> Regards,
> Ronald.
> 
>  >> 
>>  
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Ronald
>>>  
>>> Van: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
>>> Datum: 7 juli 2024 18:01
>>> Aan: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
>>> Onderwerp: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock
>> 
>> 
>>  
>