Re: newfs TRIM flag device support
- Reply: Sulev-Madis Silber : "Re: newfs TRIM flag device support"
- Reply: Ordinary Bit : "Re: newfs TRIM flag device support"
- In reply to: Mike Karels : "Re: newfs TRIM flag device support"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 19:04:06 UTC
On Feb 17, 2024, at 08:44, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: > On 17 Feb 2024, at 10:21, Ordinary Bit wrote: > >> On Saturday, 17 February 2024 at 23:20, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> On Feb 17, 2024, at 02:39, Ordinary Bit ordinarybit@proton.me wrote: >>> . . . >>>> >>>> root@sd-ultra:~ # gpart show -p >>>> => 63 124735425 mmcsd0 MBR (59G) >>>> 63 1985 - free - (993K) >>>> 2048 102400 mmcsd0s1 fat32lba [active] (50M) >>>> 104448 10381312 mmcsd0s2 freebsd (5.0G) >>>> 10485760 16777216 mmcsd0s3 freebsd (8.0G) >>> >>> >>> An oddity just above is that mmcsd0s3 is not set to the >>> type freebsd-ufs . But the oddity does not mess up the >>> testing you were doing. >>> >> >> Let me test this one with freebsd-ufs type because you're right it's only freebsd. > > freebsd-ufs is a GPT type; this is MBR. The ufs filesystem is presumably mmcsd0s3a. > If the filesystem gets mounted, the partitioning is OK. > > Mike > >>>> 27262976 97472512 - free - (46G) >>>> >>>> => 0 10381312 mmcsd0s2 BSD (5.0G) >>>> 0 128 - free - (64K) >>>> 128 10381184 mmcsd0s2a freebsd-ufs (4.9G) >>>> . . . > My splitting of the gpart output at the line I was interested in may have left some confusion. So I'll quote the original full output. I was not very explicit about the details of the oddities involved before but will be so below. QUOTE root@sd-ultra:~ # gpart show -p => 63 124735425 mmcsd0 MBR (59G) 63 1985 - free - (993K) 2048 102400 mmcsd0s1 fat32lba [active] (50M) 104448 10381312 mmcsd0s2 freebsd (5.0G) 10485760 16777216 mmcsd0s3 freebsd (8.0G) 27262976 97472512 - free - (46G) => 0 10381312 mmcsd0s2 BSD (5.0G) 0 128 - free - (64K) 128 10381184 mmcsd0s2a freebsd-ufs (4.9G) END QUOTE First note that mmcsd0s2a says freebsd-ufs (but is inside a BSD). That is what I consider normal for MBR partitions that contain UFS file systems. Next note that there was no "mmcsd0s3 BSD" shown. Nor was there a "mmcsd0s3a freebsd-ufs" shown. "mmcsd0s3 freebsd" shows no evidence of any MBR/BSD substructure. (But it was mountable as a UFS file system after the newfs that was done on mmcsd0s3 .) None of this messed up the testing that was being done. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com