Re: Getting a stable MAC address for a RPI CM3+ with ue0 interface
- In reply to: Mike Karels : "Re: Getting a stable MAC address for a RPI CM3+ with ue0 interface"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 19:56:08 UTC
On 23 Sep 2023, at 14:50, Mike Karels wrote: > On 23 Sep 2023, at 14:28, Ronald Klop wrote: > >> On 9/20/23 22:02, Mike Karels wrote: >>> On 20 Sep 2023, at 14:49, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> some more research ... >>>> >>>>> Am 20.09.2023 um 21:05 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen <pmh@hausen.com>: >>>>> No worky. >>>>> [...] >>>> >>>> >>>> I could not find any code in the network startup routines in userland that >>>> would generate and configure a random MAC address. So I looked for >>>> the driver. >>>> >>>> Apparently the TuringPi uses smsc(4), and there we have it straight from >>>> the driver source: >>>> >>>> ------------------- >>>> static void >>>> smsc_attach_post(struct usb_ether *ue) >>>> { >>>> [...] >>>> /* Attempt to get the mac address, if an EEPROM is not attached this >>>> * will just return FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF, so in such cases we invent a MAC >>>> * address based on urandom. >>>> */ >>>> [...] >>>> /* Initialise the chip for the first time */ >>>> smsc_chip_init(sc); >>>> } >>>> ------------------- >>>> >>>> So what we would really need is a tunable - one per driver or possibly a >>>> common one read and acted upon by all of the USB ethernet drivers ... >>> >>> There is a routine called ether_gen_addr(), which will generate an >>> Ethernet MAC based on the hostid and the interface name, both of which >>> are reasonably stable. Not very many drivers use it though. It >>> would probably be an improvement. >>> >>>> With no code on our side to perform anything, no wonder the RPI >>>> config files have no effect. >>> >>> It would seem wrong to me to have USB Ethernet drivers using an RPI-specific >>> mechanism. >>> >>>> Dang. That's frustrating. With aarch64 having been promoted to "tier 1" >>>> I really expected full support for all RPI platforms and related features >>>> and hardware. >>>> >>>> Or am I misreading that? I though that the Pi was *the* aarch64 platform, >>>> at least in numbers ... >>> >>> In numbers, probably. In support, no. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Patrick >>> >> >> >> Would this work? >> >> diff --git a/sys/dev/usb/net/if_smsc.c b/sys/dev/usb/net/if_smsc.c >> index 0a0268bfa1a2..4a7983a20717 100644 >> --- a/sys/dev/usb/net/if_smsc.c >> +++ b/sys/dev/usb/net/if_smsc.c >> @@ -1554,6 +1554,7 @@ static void >> smsc_attach_post(struct usb_ether *ue) >> { >> struct smsc_softc *sc = uether_getsc(ue); >> + struct ether_addr eaddr; >> uint32_t mac_h, mac_l; >> int err; >> @@ -1589,9 +1590,10 @@ smsc_attach_post(struct usb_ether *ue) >> err = usb_fdt_get_mac_addr(sc->sc_ue.ue_dev, &sc->sc_ue); >> #endif >> if ((err != 0) || (!ETHER_IS_VALID(sc->sc_ue.ue_eaddr))) { >> - read_random(sc->sc_ue.ue_eaddr, ETHER_ADDR_LEN); >> - sc->sc_ue.ue_eaddr[0] &= ~0x01; /* unicast */ >> - sc->sc_ue.ue_eaddr[0] |= 0x02; /* locally administered */ >> + device_printf(ue->ue_dev, "No MAC address found. Using ether_gen_addr().\n"); >> + ether_gen_addr(ue->ue_ifp, &eaddr); >> + for (int i = 0; i < ETHER_ADDR_LEN; i++) >> + sc->sc_ue.ue_eaddr[i] = eaddr.octet[i]; >> } >> } >> >> >> I don't have the hardware so I can't test it. > > It looks right to me, and seems like a big improvement. I don't have the > hardware either. Actually, you could pass sc->sc_ue.ue_eaddr as the second parameter to ether_gen_addr, and eliminate eaddr. Mike > >> Regards, >> Ronald.