Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)

In reply to: Glen Barber : "Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Glen Barber <gjb_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:34:55 UTC

Logboutput forwarded in a separate email.

Glen
Sent from my phone.
Please excuse my brevity and/or typos.

> On Oct 28, 2023, at 12:30 AM, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> As I think I have made very clear in the past, no, not publicly.  
> 
> The RPI build failed because of some “offset.Inc” file being spammed with null bytes.
> 
> The better question imho, is why does PINE64 now succeede when it has been failing, and if there is any direct correlation between the two.
> 
> Glen
> Sent from my phone.
> Please excuse my brevity and/or typos.
> 
>> On Oct 28, 2023, at 12:21 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:22 +0000
>> Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.html
>>>>> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)]
>>>>> 
>>>>> reported (note "RPI"):
>>>>> 
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.html
>>>>> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ]
>>>>> 
>>>>> reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"):
>>>>> 
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC
>>>>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed.  This week, the opposite
>>> occurred.
>>> 
>>> Glen
>>> 
>> 
>> Any logs ?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
>>