Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)

From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu_at_bidouilliste.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:21:14 UTC 
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:28:22 +0000
Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.html
> > [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)]
> > 
> > reported (note "RPI"):
> > 
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64
> > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC
> > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD
> > 
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.html
> > [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ]
> > 
> > reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"):
> > 
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64
> > o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64
> > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC
> > o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD
> > 
> > 
> 
> Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed.  This week, the opposite
> occurred.
> 
> Glen
> 

 Any logs ?

-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>