Re: VirtualBox

From: Jason Bacon <bacon4000_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 17:16:03 UTC 
On 5/22/23 12:10, tuexen@fh-muenster.de wrote:
>> On 22. May 2023, at 18:58, rb@gid.co.uk wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 22 May 2023, at 17:36, Jason Bacon <bacon4000@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/22/23 10:55, Bob Bishop wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>> On 18 May 2023, at 16:33, Alex Samorukov <samm@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2023/05/18 15:58, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>>>>>>> VirtualBox is x86 emu.
>>>>>> Yes, and it now runs on Mac/Arm64 as of version 7, but it
>>>>>> is known to of shakey alpha quality.
>>>>> But i think it still emulates x86, so probably will be damned slow. I think on MacOS using qemu is a best way to run FreeBSD, of course aarch64. I found performance very good, as well as stability.
>>>> Parallels also works very well, if you don’t mind paying.
>>>> --
>>>> Bob Bishop
>>>> rb@gid.co.uk
>>>
>>> On Apple silicon?
>>
>> Yup. dmesg for 13.1-R/arm64 under Parallels below.
> VMWare Fusion also runs FreeBSD on Macs with ARM CPUs natively.

Did you guys have to do anything special to install it, or just boot 
from an ISO?

-- 
Life is a game.  Play hard.  Play fair.  Have fun.